4
Investigations
Lesson 9
Title: Ozone and Greenhouse Effect-Getting It Straight!
Overview & Outcomes:
Lesson 8 helped students distinguish between the "greenhouse
effect" and the "enhanced greenhouse effect," which
is caused by human-produced greenhouse gases the most prominent
of which is CO2. This lesson focuses on areas of confusion and
alternative conceptions for many students surrounding ozone depletion
and the greenhouse effect. (Appendix B is a paper that explicates
some of these alternative conceptions.) Investigations Lesson
10 is a laboratory exercise intended to enable students to identify
the major properties of CO2, use a simple procedure to detect
its presence, and investigate two common sources of CO2.
This lesson helps learners:
- confront major alternative conceptions commonly held about
ozone layer depletion, ozone pollution and the greenhouse effect.
A concept map is not included for this lesson. Please
refer to concept maps found in previous Investigations lessons.
Background Notes for the Teacher:
Content. Please see Appendix B for the paper "An
Investigation of Middle School Students' Alternative Conceptions
of Global Warming as Formative Evaluation of Teacher-Developed
STS Units" (Rye, J., Rubba, P., & Wiesenmayer, R. [in
press]. International Journal of Science Education.).
This paper discusses the alternative conceptions that students
are likely to hold about GAC and the importance of attempting
to change those conceptions. The study was completed using an
earlier version of this GAC Unit in the classrooms of many of
the teachers who developed it. This version of the unit includes
many modifications over the earlier version that were informed
by that study.
The following paragraphs include excepts taken from the paper.
We begin with five quotations from student interviews conducted
as part of the study.
Tammy: Yeah, I think it's basically, that everything works against
the ozone and when the ozone breaks, that's when the global warming
is going to come.
Candy: [We should] start buying things that like don't have those
kind of gases in them. Like instead of buying hair spray with
CFCs, you can buy some like in a pump or something.
Billy: CFCs cause destruction of the ozone layer to
let the sun, the ultraviolet rays, get in and heat up the Earth.
Evert: And all those oil wells [on fire in the Middle
East] gave off tons and tons of carbon dioxide, which made the
ozone layer just come apart and that's where the biggest hole
came from.
Sally: It [carbon dioxide] comes out of the exhaust. And as it
goes up to the ozone past the stratosphere. Then after it hits
the ozone it like eats it up and then UV come and hit Earth.
The above, which are transcript excerpts taken from interviews
conducted with several students in the study, speak to the principal
findings. They exemplify the five alternative conceptions found
to be held by the students about GAC. These alternative conceptions
all connected (Stratospheric) ozone layer depletion and GAC in
some way and were as follows: (a) ozone layer depletion is a
major cause of enhanced greenhouse effect (EGHE) (Tammy); (b)
aerosol sprays contain CFCs and destroy the ozone layer (Candy);
© CFCs cause EGHE exclusively through their role in destroying
the ozone layer (Billy); (d) carbon dioxide destroys the ozone
layer (Evert); and (e) carbon dioxide causes EGHE exclusively
by destroying the ozone layer (Sally).
The percent of students in the study who provided evidence of
these alternative conceptions are shown in a table presented
on a following page.
Again, these alternative conceptions all connected (Stratospheric)
ozone layer depletion and EGHE in some way and were as follows:
(a) ozone layer depletion is a major cause of GW; (b) aerosol
sprays contain CFCs and destroy the ozone layer; © CFCs cause
GW exclusively through their role in destroying the ozone layer;
(d) carbon dioxide destroys the ozone layer; and (e) carbon dioxide
causes GW exclusively by destroying the ozone layer. The findings
suggest that middle school students may possess specific alternative
conceptions that limit and confound their understanding of the
nature, causation, and resolution of GW. Additionally, the findings
have implications for instruction on GW and connections students
make with ozone layer depletion, that is, initial exposure to
the concept of GW may evoke thoughts in students about the ozone
layer. Concepts such as ozone hole, ultraviolet rays, CFCs, and
greenhouse effect may be "loose" in many students' knowledge
and connected inappropriately to make sense of formal instruction
on GAC.
This lesson is an opportunity for students to confront major alternative
conceptions commonly held about ozone depletion, ozone pollution
and the greenhouse effect prior to formulating a response to the
STS focusing question posed in the Foundations/Awareness Section,
and proposing actions associated with that response in the Actions
Section. It is a critical lesson.
Percent of Students Holding the Five Alternative Conceptions
| Alternative Conceptions | Student Overall Academic Ability Level |
High N=9 | Medium N=9 | Low N=6 | M N=14 | F N=10 | All Students N=24 |
| Ozone depletion is major or predominant cause of EGHE | 33 | 77 | 50 | 64 | 40 | 54 |
| Aerosol sparys contain CFCs and/or destroy the ozone layer | 44 | 89 | 18 | 64 | 40 | 54 |
| Carbon dioxide* destroys the ozone layer | 55 | 55 | 33 | 57 | 40 | 50 |
| Exclusive role of carbon dioxide* in EGHE is by destroying the ozone layer | 22 | 44 | 33 | 36 | 30 | 33 |
| Exclusive role of CFCs in EGHE is by destroying the ozone layer | 22 | 33 | 18 | 29 | 20 | 25 |
*In this instance, exhaust, smoke, and car pollution were also
accepted as the equivalent.
Materials:
For the class.
- Large index cards or a substitute
- Overhead film and projector (both optional)
- Butcher paper and markers
Preparation:
Prior to day of lesson.
Prepare the index cards as described
for Day 1.
Instructional Procedures: (3 Days, 40 minutes each)
Day 1. (40 minutes)
- Establish eight to ten cooperative learning groups. Give
each group one of the statements written on a large index card
(leave room on the card for students to re-write the statement).
These are derived from alternative conceptions about ozone and
EGHE that students are likely to hold. It is less critical that
the last two statements on the list be used if only eight groups
can be established.
- The "greenhouse effect" is good; the "enhanced
greenhouse effect" is a problem. (T)
- Stratospheric ozone and Tropospheric ozone are different gases.
(F)
- Ozone is a greenhouse gas no matter where it is located.
(T)
- The carbon in CFCs destroys the ozone. (F)
- CFCs do double damage: They destroy ozone and act as a greenhouse
gas. (T)
- Ozone in the Troposphere is both a greenhouse gas and it damages
plants. (T)
- Ozone depletion is major cause of EGHE. (F)
- Most of the aerosol sprays we use contain CFCs. (F)
- Few of today's expandable polystyrene (insulated foam) products
contain CFCs. (T)
- HCFCs and HFCs are safe to the environment. (F)
- Ask each group to discuss its statement to decide whether
it is True or False. If the statement is False, the group should
rewrite it so it is true on the front of the index card. In addition
the group is to compose a supporting argument for the True version
of the statement, placing it on the back of the index card. "T"
and "F" follow each statement above for the teacher's
reference in checking students' ideas. It might be helpful to
set a time limit for discussion of the statement (e.g., 5 minutes)
and development of the argument (e.g., 10 minutes).
- Each group should identify up to 10 concepts in the statement
and their supporting argument, and concept map them. After the
concepts have been identified, a suggested intermediate step would
be to have each group member construct a propostional relationship,
using two concepts from those that were identified, that might
be included on the group c-map -- 2-3 minutes might be allotted
for this. Each group should be prepared to argue for the validity
of the propositional connections in their map (that opportunity
will come the next period). The concept maps are to be submitted
to the teacher for examination and photocopying before the next
class session.
Day 2. (40 minutes)
Re-establish the same groups. Give each group a copy of each
concept map and the following challenge: to identify any possible
inappropriate propositions in the various concept maps. Indicate
that there will be a point later in the period when they will
have an opportunity to challenge the maps. Set a time for this,
e.g., 15-20 minutes into the period. At that point hold a total
class discussion of the strengths and limitations of each c-map,
letting challengers and group members exchange ideas. (The teacher
may want to make an overhead of each map to use in this discussion.)
As time permits, start the class on the next day's activity.
Day 3. (40 minutes)
Ask each group to construct one composite concept map from the
photocopies of the modified/corrected concept maps. They can
do this by drawing an entirely new c-map, by linking the photocopied
c-maps together, or a combination of these. If a group decides
to draw a new c-map, they should first make an alphabetical list
of concepts from the photocopied c-maps. Each group should feel
free to add concepts beyond those already in the photocopied c-maps.
Each group also should feel free to add artwork to their composite
c-map. Butcher paper and markers should be provided to each group.
The teacher should arrange for each group to display their map
in an appropriate place in the school. Also, the teacher might
arrange for students to display and explain their concept maps
to distinguished visitors, e.g., principal, parents, school board
members, other classes.
Assessment/Portfolio Items:
Journal Entry.
Project.
The composite concept map and any presentation
can be used as a summative evaluation.
Other.
Click Here to return to Table of Contents
Click Here to go to Investigations Lesson 10: Carbon Dioxide Detection and Analysis
This unit was produced by the editors listed on the masthead.