Title: Sinks for Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
This lesson helps learners:
The concept map shows model relationships among concepts this lesson seeks to develop. Concepts introduced in this lesson are bolded on that concept map and concepts from other lessons are in plain text (not bolded).
In this lesson, the specific greenhouse gas we will focus on is carbon dioxide, the principal sinks are terrestrial (land-based) green plants and the oceans, and the comprehensive biogeochemical cycle is the global carbon cycle (see Figure 1 below). The ocean is the largest sink, containing by far more carbon than the terrestrial ecosystem or the atmosphere. However, the processes that govern the oceans' uptake of CO2 from the atmosphere are very detailed. On the other hand, students likely already have some prior knowledge of the terrestrial CO2 sink processes on which to build. Additionally, the terrestrial sink is something students can influence directly (as will become apparent). Therefore, the principal focus of this lesson is on the terrestrial sink. However, brief coverage is provided at the end of this background section on the ocean CO2 sink processes and the teacher is given the option of expanding this lesson accordingly.
As is indicated by Figure 1, two other atmospheric gases, CH4 (methane) and CO (carbon monoxide), are also a part of the global carbon cycle, but will not be considered in this or the next lesson. One comment on the sources of CH4 as illustrated by the diagram. It may seem incorrect that a combustible gas (CH4) could be produced from biomass burning. However, the burning of plant material in tropical and subtropical areas, whether it be to clear forests or burn residue from crops (e.g., the latter is a common practice after harvesting sugarcane), is a significant source of atmospheric CH4. The background section of this lesson will comment on various aspects of Figure 1.
Figure 1. Illustration of the Global Carbon Cycle. Adapted from: Trabalka, J (Ed) (1985). Atmospheric carbon dioxide and the global carbon cycle, DOE/ER-0239 (pg. 178). Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Energy.
The global carbon cycle, and the carbon dioxide source-sink relationship, is very complex and uncertainties exist. One uncertainty is the missing carbon, depicted in Figure 2 below. Note that the (average annual) sum of atmospheric accumulation plus the estimated ocean uptake of carbon (5.4 Gt) equal an amount less than the carbon dioxide emitted (7.0 Gt). Therefore, other sink processes must be operating. This idea of missing carbon (shown to be 1.6 Gt) is more understandable if we refer to this missing carbon as the missing carbon sink. In other words, there must be a sink somewhere for this 1.6 Gt of missing carbon, or it would have accumulated in the atmosphere. Put another way, the amount of carbon dioxide now present in the atmosphere should be greater than what currently is there, based on what scientists know about the amount of CO2 emitted into the air and the capacity of the sinks to take it out of the atmosphere. Capacity here refers to the amount of CO2 that can be taken up and stored for some time. Figure 2 does not show any amount of carbon taken up by terrestrial green plants, and this probably accounts for much of where the missing carbon is going. In other words, terrestrial green plants are likely the missing carbon sink. Scientists hypothesize that this missing carbon sink is due especially to the processes of carbon dioxide fertilization and forest regrowth in the Northern Hemisphere. We will elaborate on these two processes under terrestrial sink, which follows.
| Gt * Carbon/Year (1980-89) | |
| Emitted by fossil fuel combustion: | 5.4 |
| Emitted due to deforestation and land use: | 1.6 |
| Total emission: | 7.0 |
| Atmospheric accumulation | 3.4 |
| Taken up by the oceans | 2.0 |
| Total emission accounted for: | 5.4 |
| Total emission unaccounted for i.e., the missing carbon ( 7.0 - 5.4): | 1.6 |
*Gt refers to gigatons, which is billions of tons of carbon.
Figure 2. Estimated amounts of carbon emitted to, accumulated in, and removed from the atmosphere, 1980-1989. Adapted from: Houghton, J., Jenkins, G., and Ephraums, J. (1990). Climate change. The IPCC Scientific Assessment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Terrestrial Sink. The terrestrial sink for CO2 also includes the soil, because when plants die, they contribute dead organic (carbon containing) matter to the soil. Additionally, animals eat the plants and their feces contribute to this dead organic matter. However, the terrestrial sink begins with green plants through the process of photosynthesis and this will be our focus. Photosynthesis is the process through which (green) plants take up carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and make sugar. (As indicated in the diagram, photosynthesis also occurs in the ocean and this will be discussed under Ocean Sink.) The term and its meaning is rather easy to remember when broken down: Photo implies light and synthesis means to make. Accordingly, photosynthesis is to make (food) from light. Of course this definition is incomplete. A better one is-The process by which plants harness the energy contained in electromagnetic energy from the sun (specifically the visible light component of the spectrum) to make sugar (a simple carbohydrate) from water and carbon dioxide. Indeed, photosynthesis is the reverse of respiration. Green plants are called producers (as opposed to consumers, which comprise the animal kingdom) because of this photosynthetic ability. The diagram also shows that plants undergo respiration, which is a source of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. Plants do need to burn up some of the food they make in order to live and grow. However, they do take up more carbon dioxide through photosynthesis than they contribute through respiration. Yet, when they are burned (as is often the case in tropical areas) in the process of deforestation, they become a source of as opposed to a sink for atmospheric CO2. The latter is illustrated plainly by Figure 2.
The terms photosynthesis, producers, and primary production (which refers to production of biomass via photosynthesis) appear frequently in discussions of the biological aspects of global climate change. A process related to this is carbon dioxide fertilization. This process speaks to the idea that excess carbon dioxide will stimulate plant growth: As plant growth is stimulated, more carbon dioxide is taken out of the atmosphere and this helps to slow the accumulation of CO2 in the atmosphere. In other words, carbon dioxide fertilization has the potential to contribute a negative feedback to global warming. Earlier, the missing carbon was discussed. Some experts believe that this process of carbon dioxide fertilization, along with the regrowth of deforested areas in the Northern Hemisphere, account for much of this missing carbon. However, there are uncertainties about carbon dioxide fertilization. For example, plants need nutrients besides carbon to grow, such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and water. Will these nutrients be available in sufficient supply? Will a warmer climate foster the growth of weeds and pests that reduce plant growth? Will a warmer climate upset the relationship between plants and the insects (e.g. bees) that pollinate them? No one can be certain of the extent to which carbon dioxide fertilization will occur or provide a negative feedback to global warming.
Today, approximately 1/3 of the Earth's land surface is forested. A few centuries ago, the terrestrial ecosystem had a greater sink capacity than it does today for atmospheric carbon dioxide because of the much greater number of trees. Over the last couple of centuries, land use practices by humans has decreased this sink capacity. For example, the United States has lost about 25% of its forests since settlement began. Deforestation results from the fulfillment of many economic and social needs and is magnified by insufficient reforestation efforts. A rapidly expanding human population plays no small role in this problem. Trees provide timber for many purposes, e.g., construction, fuel, and paper manufacturing. Land is cleared for agriculture and urban development and to provide dams for hydroelectric power. Oftentimes, tropical forests are burned to provide land for agriculture, including the raising of cattle. Forests store anywhere from 20 to 100 times as much carbon as an equivalent land area devoted to agriculture. Deforestation reduces greatly the ability of our terrestrial ecosystem to sink carbon dioxide. And, as is obvious from previous investigations lessons, the burning of forests enhances the greenhouse effect in two ways: Carbon dioxide is added to the atmosphere and future sinks for atmospheric carbon dioxide are reduced.
Careless humans who have started forest fires, and governments which have allowed the latter to burn uncontrolled, have added to this problem. For example, in the Great Hinggan Forest, located in the northern Chinese province of Heilongjiang that borders Russia, a forest fire started by a careless smoker in 1987 demolished the World's greatest stand (3 million acres) of virgin pine. This was an area equal in size from (length) Detroit, MI to Portland, ME and (width) New York City to Washington D.C.! The forest fire was known as The Great Black Dragon Fire, and on the Russian side, where the former Soviet Union government allowed the fire to burn on, it is estimated that as much as 30 million more acres were demolished! What Smokey the Bear stands for is becoming increasingly important in the face of global warming.
Deforestation is proceeding at a more rapid rate in the tropics than anywhere else. Geographic areas where substantial amounts of tropical forest are being lost include, but are not limited to, Brazil (State of Rondonia), Mexico (State of Chiapas), Guatemala, and Burma. In Burma, the forests are a source of expensive teak wood. The lumbering and sale of teak provides the government with a substantial income, which is used to help support military efforts for defense against border attacks. A very close example of tropical deforestation is the island of Haiti (see Cobb under references at end of section). It once was almost completely forested, but now hardly any forest remains! It has been estimated (with some uncertainty!) that every year an amount of tropical rain forest that would cover the state of Pennsylvania is removed! This is extremely unfortunate because tropical forests (which are mostly rain forests') contain about ½ of the total carbon stored collectively by all terrestrial plants.
It is important to recognize that the governments of countries that contain tropical forests may be concerned about the long-term ramifications of deforestation. However, they often have current pressing problems (e.g., war, rapidly expanding populations, and large debts owed to developed countries) that overshadow this concern. Indeed, the forests are often a victim of such problems and the exploitation of this resource provides part of an immediate solution. Deforestation in tropical countries is an international problem and developed countries will have to aid tropical countries in various ways to contain this problem. Some tropical countries recently have taken positive steps toward the deforestation problem and mounted reforestation efforts. Recent reforestation efforts of land in the temperate latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere also are helping to counter the problem and increase the sink power of the terrestrial ecosystem.
Ocean Sink. (Various of the terms and processes alluded to below are illustrated in Figure 1.) The surface layers of the ocean, which cover about 70% of the Earth's surface, take up (via diffusion) carbon dioxide from the atmosphere until equilibrium between the ocean and atmosphere is reached. At any point in time, most of the carbon present in sea water is dissolved in the form of the bicarbonate ion (HCO3). The latter is formed as a result of a sequence of reactions initiated by the reaction of carbon dioxide with sea water, forming carbonic acid (H2CO3).
In order for the surface water to take up any more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, other processes must come into play to lower the carbon content of this surface water. These other processes are described below:
(a) Phytoplankton are mostly algae. Although phyto does refer to plant, algae technically are not classified as plants. However, like green plants, they perform photosynthesis. Phytoplankton, residing near the surface of the ocean, take up CO2 from the ocean to perform photosynthesis. Phytoplankton are the base of the oceanic food chain and are consumed by zooplankton (zoo referring to animal) and larger animals. Fecal pellets (containing carbon) from the animals that eat the phytoplankton sink to the bottom of the ocean. Here, they become an ingredient in the ocean floor sediment, and eventually undergo decomposition.
(b) Foraminifera, microscopic animals that are a type of zooplankton, and coral also take up carbon from the surface ocean waters and use it to synthesize their shells or outer body covering. The latter are composed of calcium carbonate (CaCO3). Foraminifera also serve as food for other animals, and accordingly, contribute to feces that are deposited on the ocean floor. Foraminifera that are not consumed also sink to the ocean floor when they die and become an ingredient in the ocean floor sediment. The processes whereby the carbon in phytoplankton and foraminifera is transported from the surface waters to the ocean floor is called biological pumping.
(c) As the surface waters of the ocean flow toward the poles, they are cooled, and accordingly, become more dense and sink. This is a part of a more comprehensive process, the conveyer belt model, that drives the circulation of the ocean waters.
To find out what students currently know/believe about where carbon dioxide, given off by anthropogenic sources, goes and to bridge the gap between previous lessons and this lesson, have students hypothesize answers to the following question:
What happens to the carbon dioxide that is given off by the sources that we have investigated in previous lessons?
Encourage students to think a bit and not stop at simple answers such as it goes into the air. Utilize the think, pair, share instructional strategy, described as follows:
In this sequence of steps (a-c), the teacher explores with the students the concept of sink using a familiar phenomenon: a sponge soaking up water. This serves as an advance organizer in that it helps students connect and anchor content in the remainder of this lesson to concepts and phenomena which they already hold in memory.
[Note: See optional sink capacity paper towel experiment at the end of the Instructional Procedures section for an experiment that could provide students with further exposure to the concept of sink capacity.]
In cooperative groups, students perform an experiment where they hypothesize which of three different brands of paper towels (chosen by the teacher) will have the greatest sink capacity (i.e., ability to soak up liquid) and subsequently test to determine those sink capacities. Step-by-step procedures for conducting this experiment have not been provided. However, a general description is given below and the form Paper Towel Sink Experiment is included (end of lesson), providing space for hypothesizing, collecting the data, and writing up results. The teacher can add instructions to the form or just list them on the board.
Prior to conducting the experiment, the teacher should ask the students what kind of preliminary information might be helpful to them in order to formulate a hypothesis. Students may mention (a) manufacturer advertising claims about the towels, (b) surface texture or characteristics of the towels, or © measuring the thickness or weight of each of the brands of towels. (Note: Since the thickness of one towel will be difficult to measure, the average thickness can be estimated by measuring several towels together and calculating the average.) The teacher must decide how much preliminary information will be allowed, but the previous information could be used to help refine or formulate additional Problems/Questions (as well as the Hypothesis), listed as the first item on the Paper Towel Sink Capacity form. As examples: Does the brand that claims to have the greatest capacity to absorb also have the greatest sink capacity? Is the dry weight, thickness, or particular surface characteristics of the towel related to its sink capacity?
The teacher might also want to ask the students in advance what kind of quality control measures should be taken during the experiment in order to help insure that the results are accurate. Regardless of whether this is asked, the teacher does need to standardize procedures and this should include the following:
Prior to immersing the paper towel in water, students should measure and record (a) the volume of water in the container in which the towel will be immersed and (b) the dry weight of the towel. Subsequently the towel should be immersed for a given amount of time, allowed to drip off above the container (for the time decided upon), and weighed. The saturated weight of the towel and the volume of water left in the container after saturation each should be recorded.
At least three replicates of each brand should be performed and the average sink capacity of each paper towel calculated. Group reports should be given and results from each group recorded on the board. The teacher should calculate one set of results, averaging each group's results. The teacher should also discuss (a) ways in which the different groups' data varied and what might be responsible for this variance and (b) the relationship of this experiment to sinks for atmospheric CO2.
Optional: Ocean CO2 sink processes. The teacher may want to introduce some of the organisms/phenomena associated with the ocean CO2 sink process. You may want students to map in these new concepts on any concept map of this lesson that students have in progress. The demonstrations of the sponge as sink process employed earlier in this lesson also can be used to illustrate/help explain how phytoplankton, foraminifera, and coral play roles in the ocean sink for atmospheric CO2. Here, the container of water represents the CO2 in the ocean and the sponge extracts represent CO2 removal by phytoplankton, foraminifera, and coral. The demonstration is purely qualitative-no numbers are provided. The teacher may also want to bring in how human influence can affect negatively the ocean sink capacity. For example, water pollution can kill phytoplankton, zooplankton, and coral.
True/False. In the space provided underneath each question (or on a separate sheet of paper), state whether each statement is true or false and explain why the statement is either true or false. Then, if you said the statement is true, rewrite the statement to make it false. If you said the statement is false, rewrite the statement to make it true.
Multiple Choice. Each question gives 4 different choices as the answer. For each question, either 1 or none of the answers is correct. Read each question carefully, including all of the choices. If you decide that 1 of the choices given is correct, circle that choice. Then, explain why this choice is the correct one and why each of the other choices is incorrect. If you decide that none of the choices given is correct, write a choice that would be correct. Then, explain why your choice is correct and each of the other choices is incorrect. (Note to Teacher: If a correct answer is amongst the four choices, it is underscored. If no correct answer is amongst the four choices, a sample correct answer is listed after the four choices. Reasons for answers being right or wrong are not listed.)
a) Respiration
b) Producer
c) Sink capacity
d) Electromagnetic energy
(Correct answer: Photosynthesis)
Name_________________________________ Date started_____________________
Questions:
What differences will we observe between the planted seeds kept under dark conditions and those kept under light conditions?
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
Hypotheses:
Data: The chart on the last page of this handout provides a place for you to record the date you make observations of this experiment and what you observe on each of these dates. Take a look at this form now, as it tells you some of the things you will want to be sure and record. Your teacher may want you to record other things, such as the temperature and the amount of water you add to the containers. On the day you complete your experiment, you will uproot and record the harvest weight of any seedlings. Your teacher will give you specific instructions for doing this.
Analysis (Results and Interpretation):
(b) Color of seedlings
(c) Overall health
(d) Harvest weight
(e) Other differences
Conclusions: Use a separate sheet of paper to write your conclusions and attach them to this form. In writing your conclusions, you should discuss what your answers are NOW to the questions posed at the beginning of this experiment. You also should discuss your hypothesis(es): Were your results the same or different than what you hypothesized (explain)? Additionally, discuss anything about the results of this experiment that were surprising to you.
It will help you to think about the following, when writing your conclusions:
Instructions: Make sure to enter the date on each day that you make observations. Some things you should record:
The space provided below is not sufficient to record all your observations, so use additional sheets of paper (draw in columns) as needed.
| Date of Observation | Seeds Grown Under Light | Seeds Grown in Dark | ||
| Seed 1 | Seed 2 | Seed 3 | Seed 4 | |
Name _________________________________________________
Questions/Problems: Which brand of paper towel has the greatest sink capacity?
_____________________________________________________________
Hypothesis:
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
Data: Follow your teachers directions in collecting and recording the data on the last page of this handout.
Analysis:
1 - Largest sink 2 - Second largest sink 3 - Smallest sink
If your answer is "yes," explain why you believe you obtained these results:
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
Trial 1 _____________ gms (circle one): larger smaller
Trial 2 _____________ gms (circle one): larger smaller
Trial 3 _____________ gms (circle one): larger smaller
What brand is the above data for? ___________________________________________
Repeat this for one more brand (list brand here __________________):
Trial 1 _____________ gms (circle one): larger smaller
Trial 2 _____________ gms (circle one): larger smaller
Trial 3 _____________ gms (circle one): larger smaller
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
(Was your hypotheses correct? Explain why or why not.)
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Conclusions:
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
| Brand ______________ | Brand ______________ | Brand ______________ | ||||||
| Description | Towel Weight (gms) | Volume H2O in Container (mls) | Description | Towel Weight (gms) | Volume H2O in Container (mls) | Description | Towel Weight (gms) | Volume H2O in Container (mls) |
| Trail #1 | Trail #1 | Trail #1 | ||||||
| Pre: | Pre: | Pre: | ||||||
| Post: | Post: | Post: | ||||||
| Difference: | Difference: | Difference: | ||||||
| Trail #2 | Trail #2 | Trail #2 | ||||||
| Pre: | Pre: | Pre: | ||||||
| Post: | Post: | Post: | ||||||
| Difference: | Difference: | Difference: | ||||||
| Trail #3 | Trail #3 | Trail #3 | ||||||
| Pre: | Pre: | Pre: | ||||||
| Post: | Post: | Post: | ||||||
| Difference: | Difference: | Difference: | ||||||
| Average | Average | Average | ||||||
| Pre: | Pre: | Pre: | ||||||
| Post: | Post: | Post: | ||||||
| Difference: | Difference: | Difference: | ||||||
Click Here to go to Investigations Lesson 12: Carbon Dioxide and Global Temperature Through Time