|
|
|
Jamie's
Theme for English B [ 0
replies ] Posted
by Jamie Myers on 2001-09-27
Jamie's Theme for English B
Observing and connecting
through different
smells, attitudes, homes, and rooms,
having the greatest of difficulties
ranking one over another,
wondering how did this
ever get this way, and what
little twist might have
changed it all!
Finally knowing at my father's death
that we only exist through
all the others we know, spread out
in little bits and huge chunks
within our relationships,
strung together in serpentine
ways as part of one great spirit
gobbling, seeking,
difference as our mind fuel!
Jamie Myers, 8/22/01
|
|
North
Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 16 replies ] Posted
by Mauricio Molina on 2001-09-25
Does
technology reinforce literacy? Are programs such as Instant Messenger
detracting from lessons and formal writing learned in the classroom? Why and
should we accept work with slang and grammar mistakes such as U, R and 4
which so commonly found in tech discourse? What do you think?
|
|
|
|
|
Re:
North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 0 replies ] Posted by Anne Slonaker on 2001-09-28
I wrote a post two nights ago and erased it
before I submitted it because I think that this question is politically
loaded in ways that dialectically impact our relationships with language.
This results in our taking binary sides between the merits and the non
merits of technology.
I have been stuck in discussions within this binary many times, but I think
that if we have move beyond the "does" (of course) into filling
out (deconstructing) the binary in order to look at the much more
complicated relationships that that technology brings to communication.
As far as computer-mediated communications, or what some of you are
referring to as tech discourse, you can bet that it is being heavily
studied (ask Sangmine and me about our discourse analysis class. Language
systems are studied in ways that I didn't think that I would ever know
about!).
In other words there is research (this message board is data) in your
classrooms, at PSU (look into that world campus), and outward from there. I
have a friend who is doing research on a rural school near by (in Central
PA terms), that won a cyber grant. The grant promotes certain beliefs about
technology and schooling and Chris is studying these relationships.
Personally, I utilized email journals for two years. I did my first
"Teacher as Inquirer" project with a group of CI295 students who
I drove to a "local" school district (an hour and a half away!)
for their early field experience once a week for a semester. Those
electronic exchanges became not only vital to our communication, but I
would hold the writing in those emails up to any of the more
"formal" paper journals of other collection methods. I also
didn't evaluate (different form assess) by assigning a possible 1-5 points
to each journal. I will argue, however, from the data I collected from my
students, that they felt more value in their writing and my response to it
than had I put a 4.5 on the top, with an unreadable hand-written comment
scrawled across the bottom of the page (my personal problem).
Through technology, on each tuesday and thursday, I would download my email
at 6:00a.m., pack my laptop in my bag, pick up the van and students, drive
and drop, then set up my van office somewhere in-between schools, or in
schools, to reply to each email in turn. These students and I worked harder
on thinking about those representative letter groupings (metaphoric to the
core!), than I have ever been able to do with a paper drafts.
I think that if we as educators are willing to take on our student's
writing in multiple, active ways, we open up language possibilities, rather
than limit what language counts and what language doesn't.
Peace.
Anne
>Does technology reinforce literacy? Are programs such as Instant
Messenger detracting from lessons and formal writing learned in the
classroom? Why and should we accept work with slang and grammar mistakes
such as U, R and 4 which so commonly found in tech discourse? What do you
think?
|
|
Re:
North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 1 replies ] Posted by Alison Colwell on 2001-09-26
I was a little curious about this subject so
i did a little research on it. Though there was not much information, i did
find an interesting article called Writing and Technology by Eric Johnson.
He in affect said that we should encourage people to use email because it
makes people more comfortable with writing and sharpens their writing
skills. I was a little suprised by the latter comment since i think that so
many students tend to have an informal writing style as a direct cause of
email,aol, etc.In The American Heritage Book of English Usage they have a
section that expresses this concern.It said that because email is so
informal most people are not concerned about grammar. Yet, it also says
that since we have become used to this quick style they see the proper style
as very boring and tedious. This article says that eventually people will
lobby to use the same type of language style that is in their emails, in
their papers.Hopefully, this will never happen.Plus, i believe we are
already seeing some of the negative effects of technology on students
writing.
|
|
Re:
Re: North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 1 replies ] Posted by Sarah Rito on 2001-09-26
It all depends on what you think of as
"proper." Is there only one right way to speak? Don't different
social cultures use different langauge in commuicating; and if they do then
who are we (as teachers and as citizens in society) to tell them that thier
method of communicating is wrong? It is different, it may not evoke the
same responses that a more powerful (politically) dialect may evoke, but
that does not make it any less valid to the speakers or thier peers. We as
teachers and as memebers of society need to not only recognize and respect
thier difference, but embrace it as natural movement of a developing
langauge
|
|
Re:
Re: Re: North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 0 replies ] Posted by Gregory Miller on 2001-09-26
Sarah-
I'm afraid I disagree with your proposal that internet slang/jargon is a
natural progression of a constantly developing language. The English
language develops as new words and new meanings of words are formulated,
used, then given acceptance. Many forms of slang provide such usages and
words. Internet slang, on the other hand, isn't truly contributing anything
by simply ignoring the fundamental guidelines that make the language so
effective to begin with. What characterizes internet jargon? The absence of
capitalization. The absence of punctuation. The absence of correct spelling
and the abridgement of words. Rather than expanding the language, it is in
direct opposition to the guidelines that allow for its development. Unlike
most movements that contribute to the language (such as certain, but by no
means all, aspects of ebonics, etc.), the primary attribute of internet
slang is its deconstruction of the guidelines that allow English to work
smoothly and complexly. It is to the English language what "Reader's
Digest" condensed books are to literature, cutting out and dumbing
down the richness and complexity that makes English such a pleasure to
speak, write, and teach. Progression suggests advancement. Simply ignoring
the standards of the language from which internet slang derives is not
progression, advancement or development. It is merely misuse.
|
|
Re:
North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 1 replies ] Posted by Sarah Rito on 2001-09-26
I think the question "does technology
reinforce literacy" contains inherient problems. To answer it, we have
to consider what we believe literacy is... is literacy the ability to
communicate within a defined culture? If so, how can we tell our students
that thier language isn't "right", if it allows them to
communticate effectively with thier peers? I think this problem has to be
approached from a different angle. It is unacceptable to invalidate thier
peer culture and thier dialect of the common language (which I believe
technology discourse to be) in the name literay. We should, instead,
reinforce the idea of intended audience and appropriate communication
tatics for certian situations. We can not expect to change our students
peer culture- they communicate effectivly as they see fit, and we are not a
part of that. We have to teach them about considering audience, and from
that discussion we could easily move on to one concerning dialects of
power, and the importance they hold in all liguistic societies. In
addition, we could hold workshops establishing a distinct difference in
creating formal and informal electronic messages. However we approach the
topic, we must be careful. We must recognize the techonology dialect as a
valid form of communication between a distinct group of people, otherwise
we will undoubtably alienate the very group we are trying to reach.
|
|
Re:
Re: North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 1 replies ] Posted by Arlene Morris on 2001-09-26
Sarah,
well said.
and in response to the north bldg. quesion:
I agree that we cannot force a mainstream style of communication; not only
is it unrealistic, but it also hinders the value of our unique social
communities. Language is beautiful because of the choices we have. And I
think that students and people in general have at least an inclination to
the differences in "choice speech." Most kids don't talk to
teachers the way they do their friends. And they don't talk to their
parents the way they do their friends or teachers. There is a broad
awareness of this. I guess I would question whether there should be a
distinction between speaking and writing voice. AND again, audience is a
main consideration. Is it the only? And going back to the technology
aspect, what does our voice gain or lose through a computer screen?
|
|
Re:
Re: Re: North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 0 replies ] Posted by Gregory Miller on 2001-09-26
In response to Sarah and Arlene, I agree
that it won't do to offhandedly throw out internet jargon as an important
aspect of communication. It's good that people communicate with one another
and use writing as a medium. At the same time, I think there is a time and
a place for jargon and a time and a place for the established standards of
the English language. The English language is great because it is always
expanding, but it does (and MUST) adhere to certain guidelines (dare I say
rules?). When conventions such as capital letters, periods, spelling, and
coherency are thrown out the window (and I think we'd all agree they're
important to intelligent written discourse), problems arise. Why? Because
there is a time and a place for jargon (informal written conversation, like
informal verbal conversation) and a time and a place for standardized
language usage (every other circumstance). The problem I see currently
developing is that students can't differentiate between when it is
appropriate to use one and when it is appropriate to use the other.
|
|
Casey's
response [ 0 replies ] Posted by
Casey Brady on 2001-09-26
Yes,One student in our 5th period CTI class
uses a electronic keyboard to type notes for every class. He even types
things again given to him on worksheets. For example, he typed his
vocabulary words and even emailed us the list with the definitions. He like
other students I think are aware of the difference in audience and that you
are not to use the computer slang/ jargon for formal class assignments.
But, this slang like others will eventually change our own language
acceptance. For example, the slang word "bomb" would not be
acceptable in the past and now takes on new meaning. I find this to be
apart of literacy growing, expanding, and changing not moving told a less
literate world.
|
|
Re:
North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 1 replies ] Posted by Gregory Miller on 2001-09-26
This is a question that definitely deserves
attention. It is my opinion that far from improving literacy, instant
messages, and also in many cases email, serve to detract from progressive
improvement in literacy. The reason is fairly obvious. Technology is always
being improved upon. When it comes to internet improvement, systems are
made to work faster in order to save its users time. We can send messages
around the world in under a second, and download whole feature-length movies
in under ten. We live in a fast-paced world. When the makers of Fantasia
2000 were considering what pieces of music would serve as backdrops to
their animation pieces, they discovered that attention spans had decreased
drastically since the 1930's due to the increased rapidity of
communications and other technological services.
What this all means for students is that they have grown up impatient. Time
spent writing out whole words when abbreviations are common-place in
cyberspace isn't seen as a worthwhile means of presenting ideas, but as
time wasted. There are now entire dictionaries of symbols used in online
communication available. The result? The trivialization of the English
language and the degradation of basic writing skills. Laziness and ineptitude
is encouraged by instant messages and email, and those negative side
effects run over into the classroom, as I observed yesterday when I was
grading my students' vocabulary homeworks. Writing more isn't
unconditionally positive. What is being written and how also has to be
taken into consideration.
>Does technology reinforce literacy? Are programs such as Instant
Messenger detracting from lessons and formal writing learned in the
classroom? Why and should we accept work with slang and grammar mistakes
such as U, R and 4 which so commonly found in tech discourse? What do you
think
|
|
An
additional observation [ 0
replies ] Posted by Gregory Miller on 2001-09-26
To clarify a point: I don't believe internet
jargon is ultimately a new form of lingual development, the way some people
have proposed. If words such as "cool," "the bomb,"
etc. were being given new, accepted meanings through instant message usage,
that would be one thing. Internet jargon doesn't truly modify anything,
only breaks existing grammatical and lingual rules in order to cut corners
and save time. Now there may be exceptions to this rule (and I'm willing to
look at them), but on the whole I believe this new computer-age jargon
developed as a result of impatience and laziness.
id like to hear yr response (ha ha). :)
|
|
Re:
North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 0 replies ] Posted by Regina Yanarella on
2001-09-26
Does technology reinforce literacy? Are
programs such as Instant Messenger detracting from lessons and formal
writing learned in the classroom? Why and should we accept work with slang
and grammar mistakes such as U, R and 4 which so commonly found in tech
discourse? What do you think?
|
|
Re:
North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 1 replies ] Posted by Nichole Hinton on 2001-09-26
Does technology reinforce literacy? Are
programs such as Instant Messenger detracting from lessons and formal
writing learned in the classroom? Why and should we accept work with slang
and grammar mistakes such as U, R and 4 which so commonly found in tech
discourse? What do you think?
>
>It's funny that you should ask this question, because lately I've been
thinking a lot about this topic. I think that technology, meaning the
Internet and email can absolutley reinforce literacy. They can both be very
useful tools in the classroom to not only reinforce already established
ideas, but formulate new ideas and lesson plans. However, to answer the
second part of your question, I think that we should not accept work that
uses slang, simply because it would be hypocritical of us as teachers to
actually teach proper grammar and then allow students to use slang in
formal writing. For example, the other day my classes were emailing the
rescue workers from the computer lab, and almost every single student had
to go back and re-type due to slang words. The kids didn't even realize
they were using them, and weren't capitalizing proper nouns such as I and
American. I see this as becoming a real problem over the next few years as
the use of technology continues to grow.
|
|
Re:
Re: North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 0 replies ] Posted by Gregory Miller on 2001-09-26
Nichole-
I agree. I think you identified the problem, and noticed the same things
that I did when working with the students. They need to learn when it is
appropriate to use slang, and when it is not. I'm concerned that unless
they learn early-on how to discern the difference, they will lose their
ability to articulate what they truly want to say in an effective manner
when the need arises to do so.
>>Does technology reinforce literacy? Are programs such as Instant
Messenger detracting from lessons and formal writing learned in the classroom?
Why and should we accept work with slang and grammar mistakes such as U, R
and 4 which so commonly found in tech discourse? What do you think?
>>
>>It's funny that you should ask this question, because lately I've
been thinking a lot about this topic. I think that technology, meaning the
Internet and email can absolutley reinforce literacy. They can both be very
useful tools in the classroom to not only reinforce already established
ideas, but formulate new ideas and lesson plans. However, to answer the
second part of your question, I think that we should not accept work that
uses slang, simply because it would be hypocritical of us as teachers to
actually teach proper grammar and then allow students to use slang in
formal writing. For example, the other day my classes were emailing the
rescue workers from the computer lab, and almost every single student had
to go back and re-type due to slang words. The kids didn't even realize
they were using them, and weren't capitalizing proper nouns such as I and
American. I see this as becoming a real problem over the next few years as
the use of technology continues to grow.
|
|
Getting
a little practical... [ 0
replies ] Posted by Michele Pavlov on 2001-09-27
Wow! Such rich discussion...I had to contribute
too!
1. Does technology reinforce literacy?
To me, the question is problematic. Consider multiple literacies.
Technology has resulted in its own type of literacy--an electronic literacy
that has resulted in its own rules and (especially)its own shortcuts.
Nonetheless, the electronic world is still capable of helping students grow
as readers and writers.
2. Are programs such as Instant Messenger detracting from lessons and
formal writing learned in the classroom?
For both teachers and students, technology is a tool, not a substitute.
When students use it as a latter (and some do), obstacles in student
learning result. Teaching students how to use technology is key, and
teachers must also model proper use.
3. Why and should we accept work with slang and grammar mistakes such as U,
R and 4 which so commonly found in tech discourse? What do you think?
I believe every teacher will answer differently to the question above. For
me, I would accept the work unless formal language was an expectation
discussed with my students. I'd accept tech-slang any day before I'd accept
students plagiarizing from the Internet. Plagiarism (what students only see
as cutting and pasting) is the #1 concern for a teacher playing Tech Cop.
Once again, students need to understand how to use technology only as a
tool. It has been my experience that most students do not understand the
definition (and seriousness) of plagiarism.
Additional Comment: The teacher talk that has been generated about
tech-slang has prompted me to think that it would be an excellent subject
to incorporate into a classroom lesson or lessons. As Nichole mentioned,
students have a difficult time understanding when it is "okay" to
use their electronic vocabulary words. Well, let's talk about it in the
classroom and help students understand their literacies and languages.
Hmm...my brainstorming has begun.
|
|
Re:
North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 2 replies ] Posted by Jamie Myers on 2001-09-27
I've read through all of the first 7
responses and their replys-- Greg and Sarah seem quite active in
responding, so we must have touched off some strong nerve here, eh?
(Canadian, not tech slang)
do you like e e cummings?
what is the difference between metaphor and meaning? If I speak of a
table's legs, am I engaged in metaphoric representation? Could slang be
metaphor? Personally, I think that all utterances are metaphor, and i think
you might understand me at this moment whether i use upper case or
punctuation or not
why am i even bothering to communicate? what's my intention or purpose? if
i am so focused on expressing a message of support and sympathy to
firefighters in NYC would it matter if my conventions are a bit lapse from
the paragraph i must submit to my teacher to be graded? would the
firefighters think less of me or my message, neither, or both if i mess up
a few words? do you think less of me right now because my fingers can
hardly keep up with my mind? i wonder if being able to get my mind to go so
fast and share my thoughts in the black pixels of this screen almost
simultaneously is not a fantastic benefit for my writing in many other
contexts?
should i bother to go back through the above and edit it for you, for me,
for the idea, for the sake of impressions, for power, for honesty, for
love, for speed-- yea, how many of us didn't feel like we really had the
time to get on here and read all these messages and reply anyway? or is it
anyways? or does it matter anyway(s)? why does it matter? why should it matter?
must we always be judging others in everything they say and do and write?
Maybe every second of school is an experience of being evaluated and
watched, and just maybe that is one of the most limiting problems of
school?
enuf, think on comrades of convention and patriots of invention!
PS: i've finally posted my Theme for English B response in the discussion
board somewhere (where's waldo?)
|
|
Re:
Re: North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 1 replies ] Posted by Gregory Miller on 2001-09-27
Jamie-
Thanks for your post. It raises interesting questions. I'm not sure I agree
with your belief that all utterances are metaphors, but regardless
metaphors exist on many levels, some simple and so obvious they aren't worth
discussion, others complex and worthy of serious reflection. It is the job
of teachers to choose those that work most effectively when discussing
reading and writing concepts with students. If a burp is a metaphor for
satisfaction, is it truly beautiful and moving and complex enough to be
considered worthy of advanced discussion? Or, more to the point of my
previous arguments, is it worthy of official inclusion in the English
language? ("Brraaaghhh!" followed by a definition in Webster's?)
I suppose my main argument is that there is a time and a place for
everything, and there are times when internet slang is appropriate, or at
least not too annoying (when communicating informally on the internet) and
times when it should not be used. For example, while you did not use
capital letters or some punctuation marks in your post, would you ever
submit a professional article to the editor of an education journal filled
with misspellings, subjective abbreviations, and a bunch of winking smiley
faces? ;)
Yes, I like e.e. cummings very much. Yet he uses his twisting of the
language in poetic context, which, like casual conversation, is highly
subjective and individualized. When he gave speeches, however, they adhered
(more or less) to the guidelines set forth in Strunk and White's "The
Elements of Style." In addition, he had an advanced understanding of
the English language before he chose to distort it, and understood when he
was employing its rules and when he was breaking them. He could turn his
language-modification on and off at will. The problem I see today is that
many kids who use internet jargon don't know the fundamental guidelines of
English to begin with, and the more they use the slang, the more difficult
learning those guidelines will become down the road. Then, when it comes
time to write a coherent essay, resume, story, or article, they'll be up a
sh_t creek without a paddle, metaphorically speaking.
c-u-L8TR,
grg mlr :)
|
|
Re:
Re: Re: North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 0 replies ] Posted by Denise Savini on 2001-09-28
Okay - I couldn't read any more responses
without having one of my own! I think the question should be HOW DOES
TECHNOLOGY REINFORCE LITERACY?
Perhaps we should look at this issue from the point of view of a teacher
who has students who are labeled as less than average.
Can technology create a safer community for these students to express
themselves in?
A cyber-community allows people to engage in communication without having
some of the anxiety that they may experience in the classroom.
What about those students who just are not going to learn
"proper" English? Do we silence them or not acknowledge their
work because of the words/symbols they choose to express their thoughts?
How do we use this tool to help provide success for our more challenged
students?
That's all for now. It's 12am and I am too old to type any more ;)
-One more thing ... can symbols, like the above winking face, add to
writing what some students have trouble expressing with words? Should we/
do we value that ability to use a different symbol, other than the letters
of the alphabet, for expression?
Night.
|
|
Re:
Re: North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 1 replies ] Posted by Michele Pavlov on 2001-09-27
Jamie's reply prompted me to write now what
my initial response was to the earlier replies from the North building.
(Are you confused yet?) Just let it be known that too often I allow my
"self" to censor.
When several of you were discussing the value of English standards, I
thought of a book I am currently reading, Writing with Passion by Tom
Romano. He introduces the idea of two types of grammar devised by Winston
Weathers. Grammar A is standard written English--you know, "never end
your sentences with a preposition." Grammar B takes liberty with the
rules of Grammar A. Repetition. Sentence Fragments. Run-on sentences.
Double voice. And the list goes on. Inspired, Romano decided to teach
Grammar B--"I want them [my students] to smash conventional rules of
writing and cut loose." A student told him that he was only teaching
what he'd always taught...only now he was teaching it directly. Before his
invitation "to cut loose" was understood, just not voiced. (That
shows a special kind of community and rapport to me!) Anyway, the
rule-breaking writing that he shares in his book is very rich--students'
synthesis and analysis being voiced uniquely! But how many teachers may
read it and only see fragments to circle? Yet, the writing is not very
different from authors already on many schools' reading list--Emily
Dickinson, e.e. cummings, Tom Wolfe, etc. So rules can be broken and broken
beautifully. And, yes, there are outside forces and pressures in which
Grammar A is the only way (oh, bow down to the P.S.S.A.). Although we as
teachers (some teachers) may be accepting of Grammar B, we cannot protect
our students from moments in which Grammar B is unacceptable. So how many
of you feel comfortable teaching the rules and teaching how to break them.
|
|
Re:
Re: Re: North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 0 replies ] Posted by Sabrina Ehmke on 2001-09-27
After reading everyone else¡¯s posts on the
subject, I¡¯m not sure how I feel about this whole ¡°technology reinforcing
literacy¡± thing. There are lots of things I enjoy about email and Instant
Messenger even while being aware of the ¡°dangers¡± inherent in the new
literacy that develops out of a speed-above all context. But as Jamie
mentioned, honestly, one of the greatest things about this computer age is
that it gives us a means of typing almost as quickly as we think. If we
lose a few (okay, a lot) of grammatical conventions along the way, it¡¯s
probably a worthwhile sacrifice. Another thing I enjoy about email and IM
is that I can establish a whole other (written) voice with which to express
myself. My email voice and my academic voice are totally different from
each other, but both allow me to express part of my own identity. I think,
too, that while Greg and others have voiced a concern that language is
compromised and watered-down by the abbreviations and slang words that our
students are so adept at using, the sort of unconstrained writing can be
aesthetically pleasing as well, just in a different way that maybe we¡¯re
not so used to considering. I¡¯m not sure that this is really a great
example, but my teenage sister once sent me an email documenting her
frustrations with our parents—she expressed her annoyance and anger through
this email literacy and in some ways I really feel as though that was the
best way words could serve her as a means of self-expression. It struck me
as a totally honest piece of writing the likes of which I really don¡¯t
think could have been captured had she been concerned with ¡°traditional
English.¡± As teachers, we should be showing students that words can and do
serve them as means of self-expression. If we don¡¯t teach them that, then
what good is anything we say about writing? If students aren¡¯t empowered by
language, then what is the point of it?
At the same time, I¡¯m not comfortable with throwing the grammar book out of
the window either. Maybe I¡¯m thinking along the same lines as Michele¡¯s
post about teaching grammar and then teaching students how to break it so it
suits their needs. If nothing else though, I am grateful to IM for giving
us those cute smiley faces¡¦ :-)
|
|
Re:
North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 0 replies ] Posted by Allison Becker on 2001-09-27
My main concern is that educators will
realize that this is a new discourse, one that eventually will be valued by
a wide variety of people, and yet the educators will continually devalue
the new discourse based soley on the fact that it is new, and creted by
young people. Why not value it, and use it as a way to teach the standard
discourse, but allow it to continue in its own right? You can use it as a
vehicle to teach the standard, but value it as a secondary and important
discourse that the studends will need to know in the future.
|
|
Another
thought [ 0 replies ] Posted by
Gregory Miller on 2001-09-27
Here's a thought: If subjective language
became accepted in all circles, without reservation of any kind, how would
we communicate successfully and clearly? If a man calls a bird a
"rilf," and another person called it a "garf," how
would either know what the other was talking about? Thus, the need for a
language with guidelines that should, in certain circumstances, be followed
for the sake of clarity. Thus, the reason why deconstructive internet slang
has no place in the official "canon" of the English language and
shouldn't be taken seriously outside of an informal context.
Also, consider this and let me know what you think.
Subjective spelling, grammar, and so on are like a teenager's bedroom,
filled with things he or she likes - ultimately, an honest and free
expression of Self, but a "home base" and certainly not a
communal meeting place where everyone would feel comfortable.
"Proper" English, with all guidelines intact, is like a public
park or town hall - a common ground where everyone can go to interact, and
everyone can understand everyone else with clarity.
-Greg
|
|
Re:
North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 0 replies ] Posted by Arlene Morris on 2001-09-27
Wow this is great! It's prompting so much
thought for me. I don't think i could break this down or make it neat so
i'll start anywhere.
First i think that communication is just that. Does the person you want to
understand you understand you? I speak completely differently with my
friends and brothers and even parents than i do with the kids, at least for
now. I find that i don't really say "what's up?" to them as often
as i do normally. So just communication itself...
what if if use slang words that you don't use, or if i have a word for
something that you don't know. (keep in mind I'm taking this from the
technology part of the discussion for a minute) I'll give you an example: I
was at Faccia Luna and mentioned the word jittney---which i'm sure isn't
spelled correctly, so if anyone wants to fix it, go for it. Out of about
twenty people only two others knew what a jittney was, one was from my home
town and the other knew because of his experiences in Atlantic City. IT's
just a cab sort of deal, but the point is that for one thing, language is
geographical.
Speech and slang bond us as communities; it connects us, another ie. I say
pop!!! I won't correct it. Language is also generational. The words that
kids use will define them as separate from their parents and other adults.
The use of jargon and slang on the internet breaks both of these. Except
language barriers concerned with the geographic thing--and I'm sure that
other language teachers in other part of the world could be having the same
concern. "French is being ruined by internet slang!"
However, if i went online to a chat room, I may not be able to understand
what they were discussing. or more maybe more importantly how they were
reacting to the discussion. I could communicate what i wanted to say but
there's a possibility that i could not understand them.
Finally, does concern for proper use hinder creativity? I'm going to
(instead of gonna to) say that intent is key. Do I need to be understood by
the majority of English speaking people or just by those that get my
speech? shit, this is good. Also- to keep going--do i want the kids to
brainstorm and be creative or do i want them to be able to present their
writing to the majority of people that are going to analyze the thought. I
face this with their journals. Does the slang/ interent jargon Or I'll even
say computer jargon 'cause as you can see it's just something that happens
at a keyboard, does it place a hurdle between the person and the audience
or a bind?
|
|
Re:
North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 0 replies ] Posted by Julie Hendershot on
2001-09-27
(I decided not to read the other responses
until after I write mine because I have some thoughts on this I don't want
to forget, or they may be the same as others...)
One thing I have noticed in 10th grade is how bad at spelling many of the
students are. Marianne actually had some thoughts on this, one possible
explanation being the result of whole language. I wondered if it also has
anything to do with Spell Check on Word. But, I'm not really sure how much
this would affect them.
I noticed that when I have to write in-class essays (blue books), I have
forgotten how to spell some very common words. It took these in-class
essays to make me realize my dependence on the Spell Checker. I never took
the time to understand correct spellings; I just clicked the
"change" button and moved on. I do now make a conscious effort to
learn the correct spelling. But the thing is, spelling was always one of my
strengths. It wasn't a problem until college and the amount of writing I
was doing on my computer was pretty heavy.
I read the Gee article and learned some things about Discourses (or is it
discourses?). I wonder if students are able to use different language in
their different Discourses. They speak to friends quite differently than
they do to teachers. Do they also do this with Instant Messenger?
I think for the most part, yes. This type of conversation is usually
informal, as opposed to more formal writing for class. But again, I also
have noticed the spelling deficiency we have on our hands.
Today's adolescents do much more informal writing (email, instant
messaging, etc.) than I remember doing at that age. I am also making an
assumption. I guess the question is the quality of that writing.
I know I haven't really come to any conclusions here, but this spelling
thing is a plaguing problem. Maybe technology is another factor. Has anyone
done research on this yet?
|
|
Re:
North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 0 replies ] Posted by Krista Wegman on 2001-09-27
|
|
I think that using email and
instant messenger can be beneficial in teaching students how to
effectively communicate through computer/technology contact. Let me
explain. I think that email helps to develop personal voice. When you are
using a computer to communicate you can not hear what the person is
saying so you have to be more conscious of what and how you are saying
things. It is easy to mistaken someone's real intent when reading an
email. Developing a strong voice to write through email is essential when
trying to communicate. One must be aware of the many different ways that
their words may be interpreted. This practicing will help students when
it comes time to write papers in which they want use their voices to
persuade, get their points across more effectively, and to become a
better writer.
The internet is also a way for new computer users to perfect their
typing. I know that I became a much quicker typer when I began using
instant messenger to communicate with distant friends. Even though slang
is used predominantly throughout the internet and instant messenger, it
must be taught that that style of communication is only appropriate when
used in this genre. If this is stressed students can learn what is
appropriate and what is not.
There are definitely pluses and minuses to the internet but there is much
to learn from it that is beneficial.
|
|
|
Re:
North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 0 replies ] Posted by William Aurandt on
2001-09-27
Does technology reinforce literacy? Are
programs such as Instant Messenger detracting from lessons and formal
writing learned in the classroom? Why and should we accept work with slang
and grammar mistakes such as U, R and 4 which so commonly found in tech
discourse? What do you think?
>
>
Everybody always talks about the future of the classroom lying in the
advances made in technology. I can still remember back to my sophmore year
in high school when we had to sit in the auditorium and listen to a lecture
about how to effectively use a search engine. Three months later we were
back in the auditorium recieving a lecture from our guidance counselor
stating that the until the librarian can finish some research we will no
longer be able to use the internet as a resource in most English Classes.
This is a short story that helps to illustrate my feelings on technology
and the classroom. I feel as though our students need to be educated as to
how to use all forms of technology, BUT that we can't teach them that this
is the only way to conduct research. It is too easy to simply type a search
into an engine such as Alta Vista and to instantly be presented with 2,000
and some links to matching pieces of information. Without any regulations
on this information we have no idea what is being spit back at us. Our
students need to learn the old fashioned way so as to not rely simply on
the simplicity of modern technology and its multiple flaws. As far as
accepting computer jargon in classroom assignments goes... to me it just
"ain't" acceptable. There are many slangs found in the dictionary
and that have become common use within the english language, but to put
them on an english paper is always the kiss of death. I feel that there is
a time when certain dialects are acceptable and there is a time when we
have to learn how to speak properly and formally. I myself do not use the
many abbreviations of cyberland when composing my email messages simply
because I feel that these contractions detract from the language itself.
Email and Instant Messanger can be effective tools for showing the student
how to express themselves through the use of written language, but when
this language is becoming corrupted it is hindering the students
development in the classroom. Call me old fashioned, buy for now this is
what I believe.
>
|
|
Re:
North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 1 replies ] Posted by Mauricio Molina on
2001-09-28
Does technology reinforce literacy? Are
programs such as Instant Messenger detracting from lessons and formal
writing learned in the classroom? Why and should we accept work with slang
and grammar mistakes such as U, R and 4 which are so commonly found in tech
discourse? What do you think?
|
|
Re:
Re: North Discussion topic/Does technology reinforce literacy? [ 0 replies ] Posted by Mauricio Molina on
2001-09-28
Well, I am glad the north building was able
to generate a topic that prompted so much discussion. No doubt you will not
see this response until after seminar, but I did not want to add my views
until after everyone had a chance to discuss the question. I agree that the
discourse used on IM and e-mail is its very own. I do not have a problem
with it. The problem I think teachers will face is how to be certain that
students distinguish what is appropriate for different settings. I would
not write a resume using slang or tech discourse. (not if I expect to get a
job). I do not, nor will allow it used in my classroom or for assignments,
whether it is an exam given within my class or a paper, outside project etc
(you get my point). I do not use the tech discourse over IM, and if I do
have a typo on a message I sent I usually send it again with the correct
spelling. This is by choice, I am not offended by those who do and I keep
in touch with my students through IM and e-mail. I do use the smiley faces,
I like them. Okay, so what does this mean? There is a time and a place for most
things. My students journal is the only place they have free reign to write
as they please, I am not grading for content, but allowing them to think
and brainstorm, ponder, whatever it may be in which my class would require
the use of a journal. Do I think technology is making our job more
difficult? Tell your students what you expect and the ball is in their
court. If they want to see an F on an assignment they will use slang or
tech discourse. Fortunately I have never had a problem with any of this, but
the freshman teachers I know (and love) have. Now, I have taught upper-
classmen the majority of my short teaching career. They know what to
expect, and know their junior year grades are important if they would like
to attend a 4 year college. Am I holding something over their heads? Yes. I
have a responsibility to teach a curriculum aside from preparing them for a
state exam which will allow them to graduate, or not. I have to do my job
in order to keep it. I did help change requirements in curriculum because I
became involved in that aspect of my department. But I had to earn respect
for what and how I taught in the classroom for people to listen to me.
Change is not simple, and I believe that we are not just teaching a
subject, but teaching different life skills. So in an effort to create a
well-rounded student they must understand that there is a time and place
for everything, and that slang, and tech discourse should not be applied in
an English classroom. If you diagree so be it. But please think back a few
years and ask yourself how you arrived to this point in your education.
Were you accepted to University Park because you were a nice person and had
potential, or because you had good grades and good SAT scores? Did you
achieve a 3.0 and earn a seat in the College of Education because you used
proper grammar when you wrote papers for your classes, or was it those cute
smiley faces? :)
We may not all agree, but we must serve the needs of our students and and
what they need is decided by the people who hire us. How you manage to help
change a curriculum or the philosohphy is up to you, but it will involve
time, research and experience.
|
|
|
CREATING
COMMUUNITY [ 0 replies ] Posted by Denise Savini on 2001-09-21
In what ways have classroom communities been
created in the last 3 weeks?
|
|
QUESTION
INQUIRY [ 3 replies ] Posted by Arlene Morris on 2001-09-21
|
|
Post your observations about questions and
your questions about questions...thanks.
|
|
|
|
hmmm...
[ 1 replies ] Posted by
Arlene Morris on 2001-09-21
As you may know from the Friday, 9-14 that I
am questioning questions for my first inquiry. What started this inquiry
was a question, that I now ask you: Are questions teacher-centered or
student-centered? I see now that this has several depths...
It surely depends greatly on the question and the classroom dynamics...
I'm looking forward to reading up on this and am eager to hear what your
thoughts are!
|
|
reply
[ 1 replies ] Posted by
Casey Brady on 2001-09-21
i also am wondering about questions as you
know i observed carol paul this week and she is a wordsmith and a question
organizer expert. you should go observe her cause she uses alot of
student-centered questions.
|
|
Re:
reply [ 0 replies ] Posted by
Arlene Morris on 2001-09-27
Casey,
Thanks. I'm wondering why you consider Carol a wordsmith? What do you mean
by saying her questions are student-centered? And what makes them
student-centered? I wonder how the kids in her class feel about her
questions. I definately plan on observing next week.
Carol,
if you read this:
Do you understand what Casey's saying when she says your questions are
student-centered? How do you view your questioning? I know you said you
script certain questions; what kinds and why? And why those kinds? Do you
often find those questions leading into others? Are you often surprised by
the responses of the scripted questions? What do you plan on accomplishing
from the scripted questions? by this I mean; from the question itself as
well as from the specific planning of the questions? Sorry this is a little
bombarding, isn't it? It's my journalism branch! Thanks both of you. And
anyone else who'd like to answer these!!!!
|
|
Re:
QUESTION INQUIRY [ 1
replies ] Posted by Allison Becker on 2001-09-27
One thing that I relly try ro do in my
classroom is to ask questions of my students that I don't know the answer
to, especially in respect to literature. I really dislike it when teachers
ask questions merely to elicit a response or to check to see if a student
can answer a question "correctly." That values the teacher's
knowledge, not the students. Also, by posing questions that you have
thought about whle reading a book, it scaffolds students in the ways of critically
questioning literature, so that they can learn how to ask more in-depth
questions. It also creates real communication in the classroom, and that
usually overcomes the silence barrier. You create a community to bounce
ideas and opinions off of, and that can lead to many more positive results,
like more democracy, and the valueing of student knowledge, as well as the
learning of critical questioning techniques. At least, that is what it has
done in my classrooms...if you try it out, let me know how it works!
|
|
Re:
Re: QUESTION INQUIRY [ 0
replies ] Posted by Arlene Morris on 2001-09-27
Allison,
Thanks. Your views on questioning really is refreshing for me. I think it's
a great approach to true (as opposed to fake, right?) learning. I think
it's great that you not only know how you question but also why you do so
in that particular way. I'm thrilled to get into some great literature
discussion with the kids by trying this. They certainly already suprise me
with the answers they come up with to fairly fact based questions. How do
you handle material that is fact based rather than discussion based? Or do
you see any difference? What other techniques for questioning do you use,
if any? Thanks again.
|
|
|
CRITICAL
INCIDENT [ 2 replies ] Posted by Sangmin Lee on 2001-09-21
|
|
|
|
Re:
CRITICAL INCIDENT [ 2
replies ] Posted by Michele Pavlov on 2001-09-21
|
|
To
continue [ 1 replies ] Posted by
Michele Pavlov on 2001-09-23
Hmm...Within a current course, I am taking
(LLED 501) my professor Judy Fueyo (who is so inspiring) is encouraging her
students to become teachers who write. Makes sense, after all. When I began
teaching, I was a teacher who created with her students. Eventually I
became overwhelmed by the pressures of my first year, and, less and less, I
created with my students. Because of Judy, I realized the importance of
this again. It has been amazing to me to observe how naturally so many of
you, the interns, are in fact writing with, reading with, and creating with
your students. Ohhh...I guess we are rounding up to head down to Carol's
room for the rest of our seminar, so I will write more soon.
|
|
reply
from casey [ 1 replies ] Posted by
Casey Brady on 2001-09-24
I observed Carol Paul and she also completed
the assignment that she had her students do in regards to the response to
Sep. 11th project. Although, she pointed out in class that her project was
not a elaborate as the others she did complete the assignment and like the
other students shared it with the class. Explaining and modeling how to
present the projects to the rest of the class.
|
|
my
Critical Incident [ 0
replies ] Posted by Casey Brady on 2001-09-25
Casey Brady
PDS Assignment #1
Critical Incident
I read the article Uncovering Our Assumptions before entering the sixth
period class on Thursday September 12, 2001. I must have been sleeping
through most of the paper or not really paying attention. The truth of the
matter I did not truly understand a critical incident till I reflected on
today¡¯s events with my mentor. I also now understand that my assumptions
about the situation made it even more critical.
The critical event can be summarized as follows: we did an outside activity
of tying red, white, and blue ribbons on the trees in remembrance of the
Americans involved in the NYC and DC tragedy on Tuesday. After a emotional
story from Ms. Savini about the importance of the ribbons and her personal
story involved with yellow ribbons for the gulf war, the boys were
literally hanging from the trees and dampened the whole purpose of the
assignment and the mood/ spirits of Ms. Savini and myself. She expressed
this disappointment by lecturing to the class stating how unappreciated
their behavior was and said they would not act this way in a cemetery.
Next, the students went back into the room to write in their writer¡¯s
notebooks about the assigned reflective questions of yesterday¡¯s events. I
told the students as they walked in to sit down and start the assignment
because after the chaos outside they better not talk but focus on their
assignment. Ms. Savini then walked in a completely different mood from
outside. The rest of the class then wrote in their journals and shared some
answers while; I sat and reflected on my statement made before she entered
the classroom.
On the second page of the article Uncovering Our Assumptions, it describes
that after the authors own analysis or her critical incident she found
three important statements that assisted me in understanding my own
behavior. I did not know at that time that everyone of those statements
would be personified in the sixth period class. For example, the first
statement emphasizes the certain assumptions about legitimate reading and
writing activities thus according to my past typical English activities
this sixth period activity was not ¡®normal.¡¯ Although, I found the
assignment extremely worthwhile and of the utmost importance to the
yearlong theme of identity. I was placing too much importance on the
writing activity and less on the emotional aspect of the assignment
including the thinking process involved when the students reflected on
thought-provoking questions.
The previous misplaced assumption led to the second statement about how
teachers do not pause to reflect on what our intentions are in regards to
the actions/ activities in the classroom. Primary, the misplaced assumption
that the students were not involved emotionally in the assignment was to
broad because I considered it to be true for everyone. Next, my
misconstrued interruption of Ms. Savini¡¯s mood and thinking that she would
continue the mundane, serious lecture mood was incorrect. In fact, she had
been actively reflecting on what she wanted the students to ¡®get out¡¯ of
the rest of the assignment and was not going to let the mood from outside
be brought into the classroom. Then, more importantly my assumptions led to
actions that were reflecting negative reactions to the students thus I was
trying to maintain the outside mood that of seriousness and restraint. I
assumed that this was the way Ms. Savini wanted to ¡®rescue¡¯ the assignment,
in a serious manner. I never reflected on the emotional intent of the
assignment as she had done and I later found out.
Finally, the third statement explains how the teacher¡¯s beliefs can be
uncovered by engaging in self-critical analysis. Ms. Savini and I did this
self-critique right after the events of sixth period. I asked her about how
I should have handled the outside situation better and about the timeliness
of my actions with the students. She also made me aware that I was rolling
my eyes a lot, which I was unaware of this new awful habit. Also, the way I
handled the mood outside vs. inside and the continuing of the serious
(in-trouble) mood was not supportive to the emotional assignment. I
revisited the time and said what I would have if I could go back and do it
again. In all, the tensions between Ms. Savini and I proved that I am not
in tune with her thinking or used to her constant changes in her thinking
pattern yet.
|
|
Re:
Re: CRITICAL INCIDENT [ 0
replies ] Posted by Krista Wegman on 2001-09-26
I have always enjoyed writing, whether it
was for a class or on my own. I think it is very important that we as
teachers show our students that we are life long writers, not just while we
are in school. Encouraging our students to write now and to continue to
write is one of my goals as a new teacher. There is so much to learn about
yourself and the world around you by sitting down and writing. Writing
about your feelings, reflections, connections, etc. helps one to learn
about and from themselves. There are many times that I have gone back and
read things that I wrote years ago and it reminds me of who I was and who I
have become. Writing is a powerful tool that should be utilized throughout
life.
|
|
Re:
CRITICAL INCIDENT [ 0
replies ] Posted by Allison Becker on 2001-09-27
|
I guess the most critical incident that I had
this week in the ESL room was that a student, who is n ow in all regular
classes, came for help with an essay for world cultures, and I sat down with
her and explained, quickl, the "formal" rules that are applied to
essay questions, and what teachers expect (especially in a non-English
classroom). She was so grateful, she actually said, "Finally, I know
what they want me to do, and now I can start doing it!" Now,
ideologically, I have issues with what I did, since I uncritically reinforced
the dominant discourse; however, I do feel that I really helped this student
to unlock a key of the discourse, so that she can use it to her advantage.
With continued work, I hope to use this incident to foster the student's
critical understanding of the gate-keeping mechanisms that are used by some
teachers to limit the expressiveness of certain students, especially from the
ESL population.
First
Day of School
|
|
first
day of school [ 1 replies ] Posted by Allison Becker on 2001-09-16
OK, so it's a little late, and I've already
messed this thing up, but I wanted to post my reflection from the first week
of school, in a slightly different way:
clthomp...clthump...clthomp...clthump...
the sound of
sensibly-priced-moderately-high-heels-as-they-hit-shiny-linoleum-squares-of-speckled-gray.
It always strikes fear into me, for it means that
A teacher is coming down the hall.
put way that picture!
don't exhale until she passes!
quick! close the locker and stand around it
looking guiltily innocent.
The fear creeps up the outside of my arms and into my chest as I look down at
my toes, trying to disappear and I realize with horrid comprehension and
sweaty fear that this noise, this harbinger of fickle fate is coming
from my shoes.
And that my instinct to turn around and do a 360 and look for its authorutarian
owner is a vestage
from my past
one that I bring with me and hope to transform
in my first year of school.
Allison,
Yeah! bizarre and true. I so want to remember what it felt like to be 14, 15,
whatever age in high school and really try to keep that in mind with the
kids.
thanks for your message.
Arlene
|
|
Reflection
from first week [ 0
replies ] Posted
by Gregory Miller on 2001-09-14
(This is a brief reflection from 9/7)
Well, the first week is over and I'm beginning to get into the swing of this
a bit. I haven't done much in front of the class, but feel comfortable in the
classroom situation, and am getting to know the names of the students and
some of their personalities.
According to Michael, I will gradually gain more time in front of the class,
but for now I am doing more behind-the-scenes. Today's class allowed me to
feel much better about things: I formally introduced myself to all of the
classes, and gave them a chance to get to know me a bit. I was happy to
notice that I wasn't very nervous at all up there in the front. Now I feel a
true part of the class, and can begin getting to know everybody. The ball is
finally rolling.
I hope I have a chance to contribute to the class up front on a regular
basis. Next week I will introduce the vocabulary assignments and year-long
unit, which I will be in charge of all year.
|
|
First
days... [ 0 replies ] Posted by Anne Slonaker on 2001-09-14
I am reposting my Tuesday, September 11 story
after having lost it in my last attempt.
Briefly, I hold my virtual hand out to all of us as we gather our lives back
around us and decide how we are going to continue on together...
We were in our first inquiry period as a building when Ellen Campbell came
into the English office with the beginning of the deluge of disastrous news.
The second time Ellen came in, it was with the purpose of getting all of us
visual access because she knew that we would need the visual to be able to
begin to understand what was going on around us.
I first saw footage of the second plane crash and first felt this life
changing experience while standing beside Ellen and amongst Ellen's students
Tuesday morning.
Ellen's difficult and grounded pedagogical decision Tuesday has connected us
forever...
Anne
|
|
First
days of school [ 0
replies ] Posted
by Sabrina Ehmke on 2001-09-13
Hi everyone,
It¡¯s been very interesting reading everyone else¡¯s thoughts on their first
week. For me, the first week was an opportunity to reacquaint myself with 12
and 13-year-old kids. I wasn¡¯t exactly sure what to expect from these young
adolescents and it was interesting to see how elements of childish enthusiasm
and teenage sarcasm get played out in their developing personalities. Mostly
the first week served as a reminder to me that middle schoolers (or at least
seventh graders; eighth graders, from the little I¡¯ve observed of them, are
another story) are very much still children. And of course I¡¯ve continued my
observation of the frequent number of times pens and pencils flip out of the
students¡¯ fingers throughout class. At one point I considered keeping count,
but then abandoned the idea when I realized that that would probably distract
me from making perhaps more important observations. :-) On the whole, the
first week (or actually, the first two weeks) were interesting, if a bit
overwhelming. In any event, it was a relief to finally meet the students and
get to know who I¡¯ll be spending the rest of the school year with.
|
|
more
serious first days of school [
0 replies ] Posted
by William Aurandt on 2001-09-13
My first days of school have been nothing
short of fulfilling. I was stressed out by the effects of the first days of
the program. I was unsure of my ability to complete the PDS, but once the
children filtered in on the first day of school I knew that I was in a place
that I belonged. It was a wonderful experience for me being able to get to
know a lot of the eighth grade students two weeks prior to the beginning of
school. The relationships that I established with these boys have eased my
transition from college student to professional. I never imagined how
powerful a teacher was until I stood before the classroom that first day and
called the attendance. I looked out at these children and thought to myself
for the first time that I hold the power to make these students either pass
or fail in not only school, but life as well. I'm not just there to give them
a grade. I am there to steer them to achieving the most that they are able to
achieve with all of their God given gifts. They look up to us and what to
please us. They bring their problems to us and want us to tell them that
everything is going to be alright regardless of how herendous their home
lives are. One of the most fascinating aspects of this program is the ability
to see the behind the scenes goings on of teacherhood. I reaaly enjoy seeing
the work of all the guidance counselors and others who really work to make
sure that all of the students are given equal access to a quality education.
It is fascinating how much work State College School District puts into
seeing to it that every student is given his/her fair shot at succeeding in
the modern school system. Two weeks in I am really enjoying the choice of
career path I have chosen and look forward to waking up every morning with
the opportunitty to work with America's children.
|
|
first
days of school [ 2
replies ] Posted
by William Aurandt on 2001-09-13
|
My most catastrophic event on the
first days of school occured in the 7th grade boys lab on the 10th of
September, 2001. I had been downtrodden witht the effects of a sore
throat for a couple of days. It had occured to me that it was time to
bring in the heavy artillary to combat the effects of this sored throat.
I was turning to one of my mother's best home rememdies. I was going to
begin gargling with salt water every hour. It was on one of these trips
to the bathroom to gargle that on of my more "giggly" students
caught my with my head leaned backwards blowing bubbles of salt skyward.
He asked me what I was doing and my response was simply,
"Nothing." I imagine he is now scared for life.
|
|
|
Re:
first days of school [ 0
replies ] Posted by William Aurandt on 2001-09-13
There are many errors throughout my posting.
One of the more costly errors was the placement of the shortened version of
the word laboratory (lab). The shortned word I wished to insert is lav
(lavaratory). This mistake changes the entire complexion of my story. I am
sorry for the misconvenience.
|
|
Re:
first days of school [ 1
replies ] Posted by Allison Becker on 2001-09-16
My most catastrophic event on the first days
of school occured in the 7th grade boys lab on the 10th of September, 2001.
I had been downtrodden witht the effects of a sore throat for a couple of
days. It had occured to me that it was time to bring in the heavy artillary
to combat the effects of this sored throat. I was turning to one of my
mother's best home rememdies. I was going to begin gargling with salt water
every hour. It was on one of these trips to the bathroom to gargle that on
of my more "giggly" students caught my with my head leaned
backwards blowing bubbles of salt skyward. He asked me what I was doing and
my response was simply, "Nothing." I imagine he is now scared for
life.
|
|
Re:
Re: first days of school [ 1
replies ] Posted by Allison Becker on 2001-09-16
I decided to (finally) post my reflection on
the first week of school, and I did it in a little bit of a different way:
clthomp...clthump...clthomp...clthump...
the sound of
sensibly-priced-moderately-high-heels-as-they-hit-shiny-lineolum-squares-of-speckled-gray.
It always strikes fear into me, for it means that
A teacher is coming down the hall.
put away that picture!
don't exhale that smoke until she passes!
quick! Close the locker and stand around
looking guiltly innocent.
The fear creeps up the outside of my arms and into my chest as I look down
at my toes, trying to disappear. And then I realize with a mixture of horrid
despair and sweaty fear that this noise, this harbinger of ficke fate is
coming...
from my new shoes.
And that my instinct to turn around, and do a 360, and look for its
authoritarian owner is a vestage
from my past.
One I bring with me
On my first day of school.
|
|
Re:
Re: Re: first days of school [
0 replies ] Posted by Anne Slonaker on 2001-09-21
On the first day of a new teaching job while
wearing new and hated high heels, I fell down the front slate steps of the
school.
The next day I began wearing my birks. I have been a much more pleasant
teacher ever since.
:)
Anne
"What ever you do, take care of your shoes..."
>I decided to (finally) post my reflection on the first week of school,
and I did it in a little bit of a different way:
>
>clthomp...clthump...clthomp...clthump...
>
>the sound of
sensibly-priced-moderately-high-heels-as-they-hit-shiny-lineolum-squares-of-speckled-gray.
>
>It always strikes fear into me, for it means that
>A teacher is coming down the hall.
> put away that picture!
> don't exhale that smoke until she passes!
> quick! Close the locker and stand around
> looking guiltly innocent.
>The fear creeps up the outside of my arms and into my chest as I look
down at my toes, trying to disappear. And then I realize with a mixture of
horrid despair and sweaty fear that this noise, this harbinger of ficke
fate is coming...
>
>from my new shoes.
>
>And that my instinct to turn around, and do a 360, and look for its
authoritarian owner is a vestage
>
>from my past.
>
>One I bring with me
>On my first day of school.
|
|
|
First
Days Story [ 1 replies ] Posted by Arlene Morris on 2001-09-12
THis is the third entry that I've written;
let's hope three's a charm. I just can't seem to capture what i want to say.
I usually just write whatever is in my head (like this) without much
sensoring. I think that authenticity is synonymous with quality. That's is
also somehting that I'm noticing in the school. The truth behind the
statement "teach from who you are" is stronger than I thought. The
first day of school Harry suprised me with his communication with kids. He
talked to them no different than anyone else. I don't know why this hit me
but it did. I guess I thought that teachers should or would be different
people in front of kids. I realize that it's the best thing and really the
only thing to be yourself. I am seeing that in how I interact with the kids.
I notice that when I'm talking to them or teaching some part of the class,
they respond and engage more and more enthusiastically when I'm putting
myself out there. It's not to say that I put this front, but that when I feel
comfortable in the situation, my personality emerges more. I think this may
be something I'll think about in terms of the students. How comfortable in
situations do they feel?
This is certainly not the only thing that has sprung out at me; all-in-all,
I'm loving this.
thanks,
Arlene
Reply
I was a sensitive young teacher, and when I lived and worked at Linden Hall,
a boarding school for girls, it was the second time after my short three
semesters of living in a college dorm that I had ever lived with a grouping
of women.
My first students knew me very well, as I did them, and these beginnings have
impacted my relationship with my students ever since.
I think that relationship building is basic to what it is to be human.
Anne
|
|
First
week [ 0 replies ] Posted by Alison Colwell on 2001-09-12
Has the beginning of this experience been what
I expected? Yes and No. I was pleasantly surprised at how much energy and
enthusiasm both the students and the teachers had the first week. Yet, i also
noticed that some of the students enthusiasm for English is not quite so
high. Hopefully, this will change throughout the year. The first and second
week had me realize that the students need to feel comfortable with each
other in order to really participate in class. Though I do see personality
differences between the classes it seems as if the longer we are in school,
the more they participate. I also realize that the more I am in front of the
class talking, the more comfortable and natural it seems¡¦probably with them
to. I was surprised at how genuinely nice all the students are that I have
come into contact with. And I can honestly say that I have been pleasantly
surprised at how well things have gone so far.
|
|
first
days [ 0 replies ] Posted by Sarah Rito on 2001-09-12
I left day one feeling a little let down. The
day felt very anti-climactic, after all the build up that led us to it. We
didn't do anything, really and had very little time to get to know the
students and very little time to talk with each other and our mentors. On the
second day, though, things picked up. Mary and I decided to start the class
in the same way we began the PDS seminar- by having the students bring in
objects that they felt related in some way to thier identity. We went around
and talked about each object, and Mary and I took notes. The activity proved
to be both enjoyable and invaulable in our advanced 11 classes. The students
listend actively and questioned each other about thier objects, and Mary and
I are still referring to the notes we made to help us take attendance and
learn names. At the Pep Rally on Friday, one of our students sat next to me,
and when I finally guessed her name right and excliamed "right! you're
the diver!," she laughed and said, "what, do you guys sit at home
and study that thing?"
All and all, it was a good week, and I'm look forward to the "end of the
beginning," as a favorite teacher of mine used to say.
|
|
theme
for english b [ 0 replies ] Posted by William Aurandt on 2001-09-11
IF I was to begin writing a page and Iknew
that whatever I wrote down on this poage was to become true the first thing I
would write about would be a championship season for the Pittsburgh Steelers.
secondly I would write down a state championship for Central Cambria High
School. I would also be spending this weekend in Las Vegas in a hot tub
surrounded by showgirls. Upon returning from Vegas I would go back to my
apartment and hang out with my new fiance' Anna Nichole Smith. Our marriage
is going to be this summer after I find a job teaching in a school district
in Lake Tahoe, Nevada. Also Tim Mcgraw will again be returning to State
College four times throughout the school year. The FDA has discovered that
the latest health food craze is hot do consumption and that the more hot dogs
you eat the healthier you will become. Jack Daniels has now become a
corporate partner at Penn ?State and will be served in the HUB along with
your favorite Joagies Hoagie. I will be one of the best interns in the
history of the PDS program based on my personal approach to teaching. Finally
Mt. Nittany Middle School Boys will win hte state football championships.
Also in a sudden twist of fate GQ magazine will be running a cover story on
me and my fashionable approach to dressing for the upcoming winter months
|
|
first
week story [ 0 replies ] Posted by Arianne Bumbarger on
2001-09-11
Hello all. I would have to say that the first
week of school was great! I¡¯m so excited to be here. So far the students are
wonderful and I¡¯m already getting to know them. One girl from 1st
period said, ¡°Hello¡± to me in the hall, which was nice. I¡¯ve also seen two
girls that I worked with at Waring Commons which was nice. I¡¯m looking
forward to the rest of the year and I¡¯m eager to take the teacher role in the
classroom.
See you all later. Arianne (Miss B)
|
|
first
days of school [ 0
replies ] Posted
by Regina Yanarella on 2001-09-11
|
|
hi this is my first few days of school
writing. it may be a little hard to follow. i did it as stream of
consciousness writing. i'd appreciate your thoughts! love, gina
A
Reflection from my Second Day... [ 0 replies ] Posted
by Nichole Hinton on 2001-09-10
As I walked into PFMS that second day of
school,I couldn't help but to think to myself 'Man, I wish I was back in
middle school, I had it so easy then- the friends, the clothes, the sports,
everything was such a blast.' These were my thoughts until I had 7th grade
lunch duty later that day.
As I entered the cafeteria for my first lunch duty, I was met with the sounds
of bubbling 7th graders and the smells of greasy chicken fingers. I had to
smile as I took my post behind two rows of over-crowded tables filled with
anxious and hungry teens. Not long after I dismissed my last table, a late
student approached me. She appeared very nervous and shy as she told me her dilemma:
she couldn't find an empty seat. I pointed her to what I thought was an empty
seat and told her to sit her books down and go get in line. Well, little did
I know that that was not an empty seat, nor was there any around it, so when
the girl came back and saw her books had been moved to the edge of the table
by its occupants, her eyes welled up with tears. Quickly, I grabbed her books
and told her not to worry, that I would help her find an empty seat.
Eventually, we found her a seat and she even struck up a conversation with
the girls at that table.
This one trivial incident made me realize something; school isn't always
about academics, and as much as I thought this time was so fun, a lot of kids
have it rough day in and day out. This one incident made me look at school
completely different, I guess from a teachers point of view, and I now
realize that middle school isn't so easy for many kids.
|
|
From
Casey; Read the first; top message from me. I messed up. [ 0 replies ] Posted
by Casey Brady on 2001-09-08
|
|
Does anyone know how to erase a message after
posting it. The two are very similar but I added more to the first, top
message.
First
Days of School Story [ 0
replies ] Posted
by Casey Brady on 2001-09-08
|
|
Some Journal Reflections from the 1st
and 3rd day:
First Day- I am finding my way around the building and know some teachers. I
loved meeting the students today and even though it was only for ten minutes,
I got a real sense of them and their personalities and the atmosphere of the
class. I am very excited to have them start learning and help them to succeed
in English class. I am even more excited to start grading their assignments
and find out more about their personal lives. The CTI class went well and the
teacher seems rather easy but the special need students are still not
defined. In all, it was a rather low stress yet productive day.
Thrid Day- The fifth period, tenth grade class two students made it clear to
me that the problem with why the students are not talking to each other is
because there are different clichés in the class. The two female students
also told me that they were in the same clichés and said things in the class
would be better if everyone picked were to sit because students needed to
relate to each other, and did not want to ¡®accept¡¯ the people from the other
clichés. I am interested to see how this class works out and how we are to
overcome these clichés
English Teacher B
Theme
for English B [ 0 replies ] Posted by Krista Wegman on 2001-09-08
I like to dream about my future and what it
will be like. I often loose myself in my dreams and I forget that I am living
my life right now. Sometimes you become so pre-occupied with what will happen
tomorrow you forget to concentrate on today. I always say I can't wait to get
started. I can't wait to start my job, get married, have a family.....and
then I realize, it will all be here so soon, I need to open my eyes and see
that I have gotten started. I have begun to live my life. Our lives are full
of peices. They are images, flashes, brief moments trapped in the past,
occurring in the present and are yet to be experienced. So often the future
seems so close, so appealing, that our present gets lost in the mix. I want
to experience it all, take it all in, see, hear, and do as much as I can. The
past is behind me, the present is now and the future is ahead. I can derive
thoughts from my past to better my experience in the now. My future is
bright. It is so bright that I choose not to look into it but rather, have
faith that it will be a good and positive one.
|
|
Theme
for English B response [ 0
replies ] Posted
by Alison Colwell on 2001-08-31
And let that page come out of you
Then it will be true.....
For me writing is a combination of truth and trust. It can make one
vulnerable to others seeing our deepest and most sincere thoughts. Writing
has a quality of power. Yet, is this not a reflection of ourselves? We too
have tremendous power through our voices. It is from this power that we can
learn that individuals can and do make a difference. And yet it may also be
difficult for us to use our voice.
Did not Frost, comment on the power of voice through his poem The Road Less
Traveled? Thoreau exclaimed that, "You cannot perceive beauty without a
serene mind." Yet, how is this connected to the power of voice? In order
to have a powerful voice one must do what they feel is right, whether or not
this may be the norm. Also, one must realize that they have to have peace. It
is from this center that they can begin to not only appreciate life but also
gain strength to voice what they feel and believe.
As i feel my own voice grow i realize that it is this voice,the voice of
power, that we must nurture not only in ourselves, but also in our students.
And that my friend will make all the difference
|
|
Theme
for English B [ 0 replies ] Posted by Gregory Miller on 2001-08-27
Today's assignment was to write a page about
"whatever comes out of me." This seems valid given the
circumstances of the week, when I have so many different questions and
concerns that vary greatly in severity and subject.
I am slightly overwhelmed at the daunting prospect of what lies ahead. What
this symposium has done, however, is bring into focus the needs and ultimate
goals that we hope to achieve throughout the year. I was overwhelmed before,
but in an abstract way; the fear rose from my own ignorance regarding what
the demands of the program would be, what kind of guidance I would be given
in the program, and whether I could rise to meet the virtually-unknown
challenges that lie ahead. Now that feeling over being overwhelmed has faded
somewhat: I understand the demands of the program to some extent, and have
met many good people who promise close support and guidance. That makes me
feel somewhat better. The only true arena of uncertainty that remains is that
of actually experiencing what we have spent the week discussing. I now know
the rough fundamentals of what to expect, but hearing about them and actually
experiencing them remain light years apart. I have some guidelines now, and
will be gaining more, but the true test remains, and I still have almost
everything left to learn.
It helps that I now know the names, faces, and personalities of some of the
people I'll be working with. It is reassuring to know that the people
involved truly care about my success, and that I will always be able to find
support and advice if I seek them out. This is not going to be a cake walk,
buit help is there. Now it is time to forge ahead.
|
|
Theme
for English B [ 1 replies ] Posted by Michele Pavlov on 2001-08-27
Go home and write
a page tonight.
And let that page come out of you—
Then, it will be true.
I want to go outside and watch the clouds shift shapes. No doubt, I will find
their transformations comforting as I grapple with my current shifts of
shape, for my ¡°self¡± as a definition is also changing. Certainly, I as a
¡°self¡± have always been reshaping from body type to mindset, but suddenly I¡¯m
a whirlwind of wants and needs and uncertainties. The latter is my hangman
though I treasure the question marks in my heart when I splash such emotions
onto paper. Writing gives me peace of mind as I, with some control, arrange
the gray words and make sense of the unknown. In all this murkiness, the one
identity I zone in on with the most clarity is my ¡°self¡± as teacher. Coming
back to theory (to PSU) after practice (after teaching) has already been
incredibly rewarding. Looking ahead, I can¡¯t wait to support the interns as
new teachers and, with them, learn and grow. Looking farther ahead (past
shifting and finding shape and shifting again), I can¡¯t wait to journey back
to the classroom. Next? (Let's not plan too much, for my plans often change.)
For now though, I am simply going to go outside and find comfort in the
clouds.
|
|
Theme
for English B [ 1 replies ] Posted by Nichole Hinton on 2001-08-27
So many thoughts buzz through my head like the
cars on busy Atherton St. Will my mentor and I get along? Will the kids like
me? Respect me? Learn from me? Am I ready for this? Can I do this? I miss my
cats. My bed here is hard, and I want to sleep in my own room. What should I
wear the first day of school? I don't want to work this weekend. I miss my
friends. Too many thoughts... I could go on and on. And what about feelings-
nervousness, frustration, excitment, fear, happiness, homesickness,
anxiousness, curiosity, joy, satisfaction, saddness, and greatfulness...
My thoughts and feelings intermingle within myself constantly- leaving me
with the most amazing sense of both bewilderment and accomplishment as I
begin my year-long journey.
|
|
Theme
for English "B" [ 0
replies ] Posted
by Arlene Morris on 2001-08-26
Arlene Morris 8/23/01
For me¡¦
Write A Page That Comes Out of You Then It Will Be True
This is like choosing an object that defines you as a person. I am defined by
more than one object, idea, emotive word, or descriptive adjective. I am more
than one role in my life and the life of others. I am a daughter, a sister, a
friend, a God-mother, a niece, a grand-daughter . I am a seeker of learning,
of experience, of adventure, of honesty (rather than truth), of human
interaction, of personal growth in soul and spirit, of challenge, and of my
ever cycling and evolving identity. I am a lover of people, of words, of
photography, of animals, of arts, of music, of dance, of fun and laughter, of
eagerness, of sincerity, of creativity, of travel, of diversity.
I am more than even I may be able to say or may even allow myself to explore.
So as I look around my room to see the pictures that I have of my loved ones
and places and events, I see myself in some of those roles I described above.
Then I look at the only image on my wall that does not have a literal personal
connection to me. It is unlike any other image on my walls; it is not of
loved ones or myself, nor did it come from me. It is a surreal photograph by
Scott Mutter of a man walking on waves in a suit, carrying a briefcase,
walking toward escalators. And below this image is written:
I¡¯m a Pilgrim on the Edge,
On the Edge of my Perception,
We are Travelers at the Edge,
We are always at the Edge of our Perception.
This, I feel is True.
And as I consider this, I¡¯m considering Identity a lot. I turn to my
bookshelf, too small for it¡¯s contents, and remember readings that also dealt
strongly with identity. I focus on a strange novel I read once called AVA by
Carole Maso. This one just seems to stick out from the others, (even Catcher
in the Rye). This may be because I am into women¡¯s literature, but it¡¯s also
because of the nature of the book. It tightropes between poetry and prose and
lacks structure, but is grouped in time. I even see that I wrote
"Identity" in the highlighter next to one line. Yet, another line
connects more strongly with the photograph and poem above and even my ideas
of myself in a cyclical and evolving creation. It reads: "The poem
demands the demise of the poet who writes it and the birth of the poet who
reads it."
I am a seeker of this change and growth, of this continual "death"
and "birth" of my perception, of my identity.
|
|
Theme
for the English B [ 1
replies ] Posted
by Casey Brady on 2001-08-26
|
|
|
Message:
|
I hope I posted this correctly...I
wrote this page as free writing and right after orientation and sitting in
front of the High School. So I was in the mind set of school...
Go home and write a page and let that page come out of you and then it will
be true because words come from your heart when you start writing your mind
knows no boundaries. The importance of expressing yourself on paper is
overwhelming and a relase of tension and mental block in your thinking
process. I want my class to keep a writing journal everyday that becomes a
type of attendance and is apart of their attendance grade. The journal
should also act as a disciplinary tool to get the students focused at the
beginning of class on the task of writing, english,language, and reading.
The daily activity of journal writing will also lead to small group daily
journal sharing in which will assist the students to become more
comfortable with speaking in front of their peers. Sometimes the writing
will be focused on themes of the books but mostly about personal
reflections on how the book/ story relates to them in their own life. Other
teachers have used this in the past and found it successful. I will also
keep a journal and wirte in it at the same time the students do. In all,
writing is good for the soul, mind, and heart. SO WRITE...
|
Theme
for English B [ 1 replies ] Posted by Sabrina Ehmke on 2001-08-26
|
Message:
|
Go home and write
a page tonight.
And let that page come out of you—
Then, it will be true.
Rather than an ¡°orientation,¡± these past two days have been more of a
¡°de-orientation¡± as many of my preconceived notions about exactly what
these four days had in store for me have been debunked by the reality of
the situation in which I find myself. Although disoriented, I find this
experience a positive, if somewhat less comforting, one. Prior to this
week, I think that I had subconsciously believed that teaching was
something that I could learn by reading the right books and attending the
lectures of informed educators. If I applied myself, studied hard and long
enough, I¡¯d get it right in time for the first day of school. A week ago I
worried about failing to read, listen, study the right things. What I have
learned these past few days suggests a transcendence of the material
knowledge that I had been so concerned about, to an understanding of
teaching that is far too complex to be captured by texts and lectures. This
is, of course, in its own way, still more frightening, because it brings
with it, the knowledge that my previous belief is indeed a cause for
concern—the error that I can make is not a matter of ¡°learning¡± things that
can be memorized from notes, but the error of thinking that teaching can be
simplified into packageable components. In terms of comfort, I prefer my
precious over-simplified understanding of this internship, but
realistically I have become aware that as attractive as this more secure
model may be, it cannot be very realistic.
|
|
|
Theme
for English B [ 0 replies ] Posted by Julie Hendershot on 2001-08-26
|
|
|
|
Message:
|
Then what will be true? I suppose we are all wondering¡¦. Is it that we have
begun the reflection phase, the truth being that we are now thinking? That
we are thinking critically about something, anything ambiguous? This is
true, I am writing about an ambiguous prompt. I am confused. I am writing
that I am confused. This is now true; I have written it.
I suppose I am wondering what ¡°it¡± is. But then again, if I knew what ¡°it¡±
was, I wouldn¡¯t be confused or wonder what will be true.
I am writing that I am excited. I am writing that I feel fortunate to be a
part of this internship for the opportunities it will afford me. I am
writing that I feel challenged. I am writing that I need this challenge,
this change of direction, this feeling that even though I have many
unanswered questions, in time I will come to understand.
I am writing that I will stay calm. I am writing that I won¡¯t get stressed
out. I am writing that I will stay organized becomes sometimes organization
alone brings me relief. I am writing that I won¡¯t be discouraged if I can¡¯t
stay calm, unstressed, or organized.
I am writing that this year passes slowly, as it is my last here. I am writing
that every moment I have with my friends will be impressed on my memory and
theirs. I am writing that the relationships I have fostered in my life will
continue to evolve and grow as I evolve and grow.
I am writing that if life hands me a lemon, I will make lemonade. I am
writing that opportunity will someday knock at my door. I am writing that
every cloud will have a silver lining. I am writing that the grass will be
greener on the other side.
I wrote this page tonight, so now it must be true.
|
Theme
for English B (not A) [ 1
replies ] Posted
by Anne Slonaker on 2001-08-25
|
Message:
|
Let that page come out of you-–
Then, it will be true.
I am much more interested in your voice than I am in my own. I lose my own
voice in the swirl of loose words that build up in my mind as the day
progresses. Sometimes I think that I reduce my own talk to a spewing forth
of those fragmented words.
Maybe I am couching an insecurity I feel about the unknowns of building of
our lives together from negotiations that are also a part of building a
community. I absolutely believe what we are doing as I try to live my own
inquiry, yet I appreciate the difficulty of equitably hearing all of our
voices. This is a struggle that used to wake me up at 3:00 in the morning
when I was in the classroom. In the quiet of the night those voices are
pointed reminders of the difficulties of really communicating with one
another.
I want to listen more, yet I hear myself talking when I would rather not
be. I know I sometimes talk because that is what I perceive to be
appropriate in that space and time of social interaction and convention. As
much as I want to break out of the structures that I think bind my creative
voice, I am amid them, trying to keep from drowning in them.
That¡¯s my truth for this moment.
Anne Slonaker
|
|
|
|
|
Themes
for English B [ 0 replies ] Posted by Sarah Rito on 2001-08-25
|
Message:
|
Here's my theme, if anybody's
interested!
Let it come from me, and then it will be true. I don't know that anything I
write to you could ever really be true. Even though I don't know who will
read this, or what ends they hope to achieve through this means, someone
will read it, and judge it and form there opinions about it and me.
Therefore, for me, if someone else will ever read it, it cannot be totally
true. It can always be honest, and thoughtful and contain truths- but there
are many faces to truth, and ways to reveal what's true without revealing
all of what is true. That said, and with reflective journals in mind,
writing for someone else's benefit (something they will read...) is very
important, and many honest truths can be revealed through writing. Many
mis-interpretations can be made as well, as Ellen demonstrated in her
presentation. Sometimes we read too much into written word. Writing must
have a purpose, whether that purpose is to soothe the writer's mind, or the
reader's, to communicate ideas or to communicate conflict will have a great
impact on the "truth" of the writing. But, really, what is truth?
It's a very abstract idea with many of it's own shades of meaning and
interpretation, who's to say what's true? Do I decide, or do you? Was this
writing truthful? It was honest, and thoughful, does that make it true? Or
is there a deeper meaning to truth? Does it imply some spritual connection
that the reader or the writer makes to a document? ????
|
|