(For best results, view and print this document in 10 point Courier

or a similar mono-spaced font.)

WORKFORCE BRIEF # 4

Prepared by the National Alliance of Business

BASIC WORKPLACE SKILLS:

The Foundation for Productivity Improvement

INTRODUCTION

The competitive pressures of our increasingly global economy

are forcing American firms to change the way they operate in order

to be more productive. These changes in the ways firms do business

frequently require more from workers than was needed in the past.

Today firms need workers who not only are able to read, write,

speak, and understand English, but who also have mathematics,

problem solving, and interpersonal skills.

************************************************************

* "Like many employers, Circuit City has, in fact, *

* eliminated or sharply reduced most of its low-skilled *

* jobs. . . Most of the remaining non-sales personnel *

* are focused on returns, exchanges, and customer *

* satisfaction, all of which require good communications, *

* critical thinking, and interpersonal skills." *

* *

* Alan L. Wurtzel *

* Vice Chairman, Circuit City Stores, Inc. *

* Congressional Testimony, February 1995 *

************************************************************

And, it is not just this array of skills that is important; it

is also their level. Increasingly, workers must be able to

integrate or synthesize information from complex or lengthy texts or

documents, and conceptualize and perform multi-step mathematical

tasks. This expanded set and higher level of skills now constitute

"basic workplace skills" -- skills that are needed as the foundation

for almost all productive work, and the foundation for almost all

productivity improvement efforts.

Most company improvement efforts, however, tend to overlook

basic workplace skills as the foundation for successful change.

This Workplace Brief will show that:

* The level of employees' basic workplace skills has a direct

impact on company productivity and a company's ability to adopt

needed workplace changes. Low skill levels limit productivity

and constrain change, while high skill levels augment

productivity and bolster change efforts.

* Just as low basic workplace skills can have a negative impact on

company productivity, programs to build these skills can have a

positive impact on productivity and a firm's ability t

undertake more comprehensive improvement strategies.

* Most studies indicate that about 20 percent of America's workers

have low basic workplace skills. Improving employees' basic

workplace skills isn't some other company's problem, it's every

company's problem.

* Investing in the development of employees' basic workplace

skills does not have to be difficult. There are many programs

and resources companies can tap into for assistance.

IMPACT OF LOW BASIC SKILLS

Many employers realize the negative impact poor basic workplace

skills can have on a firm's economic performance. When asked the

connection between employee skills and productivity, employers

surveyed for a 1993 W.E. Upjohn Institute study contended that basic

skills were highly linked to productivity.

Among companies participating in a 1982 Center for Public

Resources Survey of Basic Skills in the U.S. Workforce:

* 30 percent reported secretaries having difficulty reading at

the level required by the job;

* 50 percent reported managers and supervisors unable to write

paragraphs free of grammatical errors; and

* 50 percent reported skilled and semi-skilled employees,

including bookkeepers, unable to use decimals and fractions

in math problems.

In the same survey, companies told stories of workers killed

because of their inability to read warning signs, workers making

costly mistakes because they couldn't understand correspondence, and

workers losing time on the job because they had to be "physically"

instructed in how to use machinery due to their inability to read

instruction manuals. While the survey is somewhat dated, if

anything, skill requirements have increased since it appeared.

Not only do poor skills affect a firm's current economic

performance, they also limit a firm's ability to make productivity

improvements. Companies bringing in new, complex technologies need

workers who can read and follow complicated instruction manuals.

Those adopting statistical process control techniques need workers

with a basic understanding of statistics and probability. And

companies shifting to team-based management and production require

employees with good communication skills.

These connections between productivity improvements and basic

workplace skills are recognized by many employers. A 1991 survey

conducted by the National Association of Manufacturers found that 40

percent of the manufacturing executives questioned attributed their

company's inability to upgrade technologically to worker

deficiencies in literacy and basic skills, 37 percent said

inadequate employee skills hampered their efforts to improve

productivity, and 30 percent said they couldn't reorganize their

workplace because their "employees cannot learn new tasks." Basic

workplace skills are not just important in their own right, they are

important as a foundation for a firm's other productivity

improvement efforts.

************************************************************

* Consequences of Low Basic Skills *

* *

* - In a large urban bank, managers discovered that a *

* major reason for low productivity among the *

* secretarial and clerical staff was the fact that *

* 70 percent of dictated correspondence had to be *

* redone at least once because of spelling and *

* grammatical errors. *

* *

* - In a major manufacturing company, one employee who *

* didn't know how to read a ruler mismeasured yards of *

* steel sheet, wasting almost $700 worth of material *

* in one morning. *

* *

* - The same manufacturing company invested heavily in *

* equipment to regulate inventories and production *

* schedules. Unfortunately, the workers were unable to *

* enter numbers accurately, which destroyed inventory *

* records and resulted in production orders for the *

* wrong products. Correcting the errors cost the *

* company millions of dollars and wiped out any savings *

* projected as a result of the new automation. *

* *

* The Bottom Line: Basic Skills in the Workplace *

* U.S. Departments of Labor and Education *

************************************************************

BENEFITS OF BASIC SKILLS PROGRAMS

Although some employers realize the link between employees'

basic skills and their firm's ability to adopt productivity

improvements, many still ignore the importance of basic workplace

skills training in improving competitiveness. When companies search

for ways to improve their bottom lines, they usually focus on

adopting new technologies, reorganizing work, or providing training

in technical or work process skills. They tend to either assume

their employees have needed basic skills or to ignore basic skills

problems because "basic skills training is not a company

responsibility."

Such thinking, however, is shortsighted. Basic workplace

skills programs improve company productivity and support the

successful implementation of other productivity improvement efforts.

The Upjohn Institute estimated that basic skills program

participation may enhance employees' productivity . . . by 10 to 20

percent.

A 1992 Southport Institute for Policy Analysis study found that

programs in basic workplace skills improve both employees' attitudes

and behaviors, and firms' bottom lines. The small and mid-sized

companies it surveyed reported improvements in workers' motivation,

self-esteem, willingness to take responsibility, teamwork, and

communication and problem solving abilities. They also reported

lower turnover rates and improvements in quality and productivity.

In a 1992 study, Mikulecky and Lloyd found that basic workplace

skills training resulted in:

* More instances of employees using reading and writing on

the job;

* Higher employee participation in job meetings;

* Employees asking more questions and making more suggestions

at work;

* Improvements in job attendance and safety; and

* Significant gains in supervisory ratings.

Data also exist to support the contention that programs in

basic workplace skills enhance companies' other workplace

improvement efforts. The Southport Institute study found that firms

that invest in workplace education benefit more from new technology

and reorganization of work than do firms that do not include a basic

education component in their quality programs.

Basic workplace skills programs are a good value. The Upjohn

Institute noted that nearly all of the firms in its study believed

that the benefits of their basic workplace skills programs

compensated for their costs. It is clear: basic workplace skills

training is not just an employee benefit, it is a sound investment

strategy.

EXTENT OF LOW SKILLS

No employer can afford to assume he or she does not have a

basic workplace skills problem. By some estimates, 20 percent of

current workers have low skills, by others, the number is nearly 40

percent.

A 1995 National Employer Survey conducted by the National

Center on the Educational Quality of the Workforce found that, on

average, employers considered only 80 percent of their workers to be

proficient at their jobs. Thirty-two percent of employers thought

that 75 percent or less of their employees were proficient at their

jobs. Only 19 percent of employers thought their percentage of

proficient employees was greater than 95 percent.

Other research confirms that employees with low skills are not

confined to a small percentage of workplaces. Over half of the

small to mid-sized companies surveyed for the Southport Institute

study indicated that they had skills problems that would merit basic

skills programs.

The National Adult Literacy Survey (NALS), a large-scale,

national survey of adult literacy released in 1993, found that 14 to

16 percent of our nation's labor force have very low "prose,"

"document," and "quantitative" skills, and an additional 24 to 28

percent have skills that are only marginally better.

Workers in the lowest skill group range from those having

almost no basic skills at all, to those only able to handle such

simple tasks as totaling an entry on a deposit slip, locating the

time or place of a meeting on a form, and identifying a piece of

specific information in a brief news article. Those workers

categorized as having slightly higher basic skills can handle tasks

like calculating the total cost of a purchase, determining the

difference in price between two items, locating a particular

intersection on a street map, and entering background information on

a simple form.

Neither group has the reading and problem-solving skills

necessary for such complex tasks as integrating information from

relatively long or dense text or documents, and determining the

appropriate arithmetic operation based on information contained in a

directive, and identifying the quantities needed to perform that

operation.

When determining whether employees' skills come up short, it is

important to remember the fact that skill requirements are not

static. Skill needs ten years ago are not skill needs today, and

today's skill needs are likely to be outdated in a few short years

-- or even months. Longshoremen who once manually registered all of

the materials brought in and out of a port are using computers to

track shipments and calculate cargo space needs. An increasingly

sophisticated banking industry is reducing its numbers of tellers

and hiring more customer service representatives who must be

knowledgeable about a wide array of financial instruments.

It is projected that, in the future, the greatest job growth

will be in occupations with basic skill requirements considerably

above the mean for current workers. Employers should think about

preparing for that future now. Workers will need strong basic

workplace skills if they are to operate successfully in companies

adopting high performance work practices or installing new

technologies.

************************************************************

* Basic Skills Program Gains *

* *

* - Otto Engineering Inc. claims a 340 percent increase *

* in productivity since it launched its math and *

* English program in 1988. *

* *

* - Weber Metals reduced scrap from 20 to 2 percent, *

* reduced errors, and improved production reports and *

* communications after it provided classes in English *

* as a second language, math, spelling, computer *

* literacy, and GED preparation. *

* *

* - Wm. Dudek Manufacturing Company improved sales *

* volume, profit, work flow, and on-time deliveries *

* after it provided English as a second language and *

* math classes to its 30 employees. *

* *

* - A basic skills training program at Delta Wire *

* decreased nonconforming material from 6 or 7 percent *

* to 2 percent, increased productivity from 70,000 to *

* 90,000 pounds per week, and led to a "best in class" *

* award from Goodyear, its largest customer. *

* *

* "Training: The Case for Increased Investment" *

* Employment Relations Today *

************************************************************

WHERE TO START

Companies do not have to develop and deliver programs

themselves. There is help available. A variety of organizations are

skilled in developing, customizing, and delivering basic workplace

skills programs. Companies might look for help from:

* Community colleges;

* Adult education centers in school districts;

* Non-profit, community-based organizations;

* For-profit training firms; and

* Volunteer basic skills programs.

The better the quality of a basic workplace skills program, the

greater its benefits. Companies thinking of launching programs

should make sure that the programs:

* Link training objectives to company objectives;

* Teach basic skills in the context of workplace demands

and activities;

* Connect basic skills training to other workplace and

workforce initiatives;

* Encourage the transfer of skills learned in the classroom

back to the workplace;

* Tailor training to employee needs and facilitate employee

participation; and

* Employ highly skilled basic workplace skills providers.

Basic workplace skills programs are not expensive. For many

small and mid-sized companies, there is little expense beyond the

time involved in planning the program and releasing employees from

work to participate in classes. There are many ways that companies

can keep the costs of their basic skills programs low:

* The federal and many state governments offer grants to

subsidize the costs of basic workplace skills programs.

* Some states offer tax credits for basic workplace skills

programs.

* Many community colleges charge only the delivery costs

associated with their basic skills programs, effectively

underwriting all of the development costs.

* Some unions will share the costs of basic skills programs

with employers.

* Some volunteer basic skills programs will charge companies

only for the design and oversight associated with a basic

workplace skills program, and use their volunteers for delivery.

The following National Workforce Assistance Collaborative tools

might serve as a starting point for companies considering a basic

workplace skills program:

* Resource Guide - a listing of national membership organizations

and state program offices supporting workplace and workforce

changes in workplace literacy, employee training,

labor-management relations, and work restructuring;

* Workplace Literacy Publications - an annotated bibliography

of workplace literacy print resources;

* Workplace Literacy Product Checklist - a checklist companies

can use to determine whether particular workplace literacy

products follow best practice (available summer, 1995); and

* Workplace Literacy Interview Guide - an interview guide

companies can use to interview and select appropriate workplace

literacy service providers (available summer, 1995).

************************************************************

* Are You Likely to Have a Basic Workplace Skills Problem? *

* *

* - Individuals employed in the finance, insurance, and *

* real estate industries, and the public administration *

* sector have, on average, the highest levels of basic *

* skills. *

* *

* - Individuals employed in agriculture, construction, *

* manufacturing, and mining have, on average, the *

* lowest levels of skills. *

* *

* - Basic skills proficiencies are highest among *

* professional workers, managers, administrators, *

* and technical workers. *

* *

* - Basic skills are lowest among semi-skilled and *

* unskilled blue collar workers, and among farm, *

* forestry, and fishing workers. *

* *

* - A full 60 percent of front-line workers within the *

* goods producing industries cannot match information *

* in a text to a required task when some inference is *

* involved, cannot integrate information from several *

* documents, and cannot deal with complex tables *

* or graphs. *

* *

* National Adult Literacy Survey, 1993 *

************************************************************

FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE ISSUES PRESENTED IN THIS BRIEF CAN BE

OBTAINED FROM:

Bergman, Terri, "Training: The Case for Increased Investment,"

Employment Relations Today, Winter 1994/95.

Chisman, Forest P., The Missing Link: Workplace Education in Small

Business (Washington, DC: Southport Institute for Policy Analysis,

1992).

Educational Testing Service, Adult Literacy in America: A First

Look at the Results of the National Adult Literacy Survey

(Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, 1993).

Hollenbeck, Kevin, Classrooms in the Workplace (Kalamazoo, MI: W.E.

Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 1993).

National Workforce Assistance Collaborative, Workforce Brief #2 -

Company Training: A Key Strategy for Success (Washington, DC:

National Alliance of Business, 1995)

U.S. Department of Labor and Education, The Bottom Line: Basic

Skills in the Workplace (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor

and Education, 1988).

Terri Bergman 1995

 

The National Workforce Assistance Collaborative builds the capacity

of the service providers working with small and mid-sized companies

in order to help businesses adopt high-performance work practices,

become more competitive, and ultimately advance the well-being of

their employees. The Collaborative was created with a $650,000

cooperative agreement grant from the Department of Labor to the

National Alliance of Business. Current partners on the project

include the Council for Adult and Experiential Learning, the

Institute for the Study of Adult Literacy at The Pennsylvania State

University, the Maryland Center for Quality and Productivity, and

the National Labor-Management Association. The Collaborative

provides assistance in four areas: employee training, labor-

management relations, work restructuring, and workplace literacy.

For more information on the Collaborative, contact Bernice Jones at

the National Alliance of Business, 202/289-2915.

Bundles of 25 copies of this brief are available for $7.75 (includes

postage and handling) by contacting the National Alliance of

Business, Distribution, P.O. Box 501, Annapolis Junction, MD 20701,

phone: 1-800-787-7788, Fax: 301-206-9789.

.